Optional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 1 年前The Have Yachtslemmy.worldimagemessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down118
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageThe Have Yachtslemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square70linkfedilink
minus-squareHydraulicMonkey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前Yeah, so to simplify, written off at a different rate.
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 年前Not really, at all. It’s written off at the same rate, while being subject to a whole other type of tax, which means the company pays more tax, rather than less.
minus-squareHydraulicMonkey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前Ok, so the point I was originally trying to make was that claiming a yacht as an entertainment expense was less attractive. Would you agree?
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·1 年前If sticking a fork in your eye is “less attractive” than eating icecream then sure. … but let’s be honest, that’s not what you were trying to say. You were just plain wrong. Get over it. No one cares.
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前The only one who can’t admit they were wrong here is you.
Yeah, so to simplify, written off at a different rate.
Not really, at all.
It’s written off at the same rate, while being subject to a whole other type of tax, which means the company pays more tax, rather than less.
Ok, so the point I was originally trying to make was that claiming a yacht as an entertainment expense was less attractive. Would you agree?
If sticking a fork in your eye is “less attractive” than eating icecream then sure.
… but let’s be honest, that’s not what you were trying to say. You were just plain wrong. Get over it. No one cares.
The only one who can’t admit they were wrong here is you.