• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d like to see these spread through neighborhoods, rather than at one central location. It would cut down on power outages due to storms/downed lines.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I guess they built it there so it can make use of existing infrastructure without too many major changes .

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That drives up maintenance significantly. You suddenly need your technicians driving around everywhere servicing small units rather than at one central location making sure the main unit is online.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        🤷‍♂️. Like technicians aren’t already driving around servicing transformers and downed power lines. It’s not like a battery pack requires daily maintenance.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Both is better. Centralised is more efficient for maintenance and cost. Distributed allows less transport cost for the power and less chance of total failure, ut more chance of individual failure.

      One of the issues with transitioning is the grid is designed with large plants in mind. Using existing infrastructure more efficiently makes renewables more attractive for investment, which hastens the transition.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Large scale batteries tend to need to be connected to the grid to function, they need to sync with the grid frequency, and can’t run by themselves.