Anarchism is the political philosophy and practice that opposes all hierarchies along with their “justifying” dogmas and proposes the unending pursuit of ana...
Lmfao, tell us you know nothing about anarchism without saying you know nothing about anarchism
Hint: one of the main points of anarchy is that there is no “country”. How about trying to learn, instead of so confidently asserting your ignorance? (lol, as if)
that would only be possible if you gave any shits in the first place, which you clearly didn’t, you’re here to troll, not learn, so as much as it would be convenient to shift the blame, your ignorance is all on you. At least own it. (again - as if, lmfao)
Like this sub where the person in authority unilaterally deletes dissent immediately? Or are your principles something you only apply later, after all the undesirables are “taken care of”?
Well, the mod kind of illustrates why anarchism is unviable by using their power in the heirarchy here to silence dissent.
Even with the small sphere of influence here in their own community, anarchists cannot run things without resorting to heirarchy as a literal first option.
A good object lesson, as in the real world this would be using a prison or a firing squad or whatever.
Spoiler: it doesn’t
What a surprise. The coomer doesn’t understand political theory.
Wtf is a coomer
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the coomer
So a gross unrelated thing applied randomly without reason. Cool.
Not without reason if you think about it
I assume OP is referencing that the skeptical commenter was from a Lemmy porn instance.
Except for all the places and times it has.
Examples of successful countries without a government?
Zapatistas?
Little shoes?
Example of successful monarchies without a monarch?
Even the concept of “country” is not applicable. Anarchists don’t believe in borders.
Lmfao, tell us you know nothing about anarchism without saying you know nothing about anarchism
Hint: one of the main points of anarchy is that there is no “country”. How about trying to learn, instead of so confidently asserting your ignorance? (lol, as if)
Perfect case study for how to get me to care less ^
Lol, perfect confirmation of my point… 😂
that would only be possible if you gave any shits in the first place, which you clearly didn’t, you’re here to troll, not learn, so as much as it would be convenient to shift the blame, your ignorance is all on you. At least own it. (again - as if, lmfao)
Every time an anarchist is questioned, they either struggle or demand someone read something.
So yeah a point was proven here
Every time you’re given an opportunity to educate yourself, you seem to reject it. Is that a problem with anarchists or with you?
Frankly I don’t think anyone here cares what you think, you’re only hurting yourself with your willful ignorance.
Turns out reading is an important way to learn.
I give zero shits about people who act like you
Anarchy isn’t for you friend. Literacy is a big part of it
Snobby twats are a bigger part of it, apparently
anarchism ≠ anarchy
Like this sub where the person in authority unilaterally deletes dissent immediately? Or are your principles something you only apply later, after all the undesirables are “taken care of”?
Thank you for explaining this.
Well folks, let’s go home. natural_motions has it all figured out.
Well, the mod kind of illustrates why anarchism is unviable by using their power in the heirarchy here to silence dissent.
Even with the small sphere of influence here in their own community, anarchists cannot run things without resorting to heirarchy as a literal first option.
A good object lesson, as in the real world this would be using a prison or a firing squad or whatever.
freedom of association applies here. “Spoiler: It doesn’t” does not constitute a nuanced discussion anyway.
maybe you can talk to dessalines or nutomic or wait for the plugin system for collective moderation.