• Rainonyourhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This planet is just one part of it and in order for the universe to have a healthy gut we would have to terra form the planets and make healthy worlds.

    I want to question the assumption that an increase of Earth-like planets would be better than the current state of the universe.

    The idea that the current state of the universe is unhealthy, and needs us to save it by increasing homogeneity by altering other planets to look more like ours…

    I’m just gonna say it.

    It’s eerily reminiscent of the colonizers’ mindset of “saving the world by making it more like us”

    It comes from the assumption that others’ current state of being is inferior to ours, and need to be fixed, by us assimilating then into our, superior, state of being. It comes from an assumption that there exists inferior and superior states at all, and that superior states of being should be strived towards. Rather than assuming that diversity is better than homogeneity, and different states of being are neither inferior or superior, they simply are.

    I question the idea that us changing the universe to resemble us, would be superior to the current state of the universe

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I see your point. I would be guilty of that mindset that a planet full of life (not necessarily human life) is superior to a dead rock.