Opinion: The return to office fallacy | CNN
www.cnn.com
The return-to-office demands make little sense from an overall economic perspective, while working parents, in particular, benefit from not having to waste time commuting to an office, writes Peter Bergen.

The Absurdity of the Return-to-Office Movement::The return-to-office demands make little sense from an overall economic perspective, while working parents, in particular, benefit from not having to waste time commuting to an office, writes Peter Bergen.

  • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
    0·
    10 months ago

    Who wants to live in a city centre though?

    The only appeal is that it’s close to work, and we no longer need to go to that.

    • stoly@lemmy.worldEnglish
      01·
      10 months ago

      It’s so nice to have everything within a 5 block radius. Everything I need is there. No cars, no traffic, just lots of constant exercise and fresh air. When I want to go to a museum, I go to a museum–no gas, driving, parking. When I want to go to a concert, I jump on the subway and go to a concert. But go on, tell us how living in suburbs and breathing the fumes from the car in front of you is better.

        • stoly@lemmy.worldEnglish
          01·
          10 months ago

          This isn’t 1980. Cities are really not polluted. Those who live in the suburbs tend to be less healthy due to lack of activity and increased exposure to the pollution emitted from cars.

          • Haha@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            If you are in the US or EU, maybe? Look at the third words though. This fresh air claim does not apply to everywhere in the world: especially when talking about downtown.