• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No, a critter is more than just DNA. And most genome sequences aren’t complete, and DNA is currently slow to print artificially, and the OG samples from anything dead in ambient conditions for more than days are badly degraded.

        If we have DNA we could maybe do it one day, in principle. Especially for critters like mammoths with living relatives. This particular tech from the story isn’t highly related, though.

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        We have mammoth DNA and scientists have been working to restore them for at least a couple of decades now. Every few years you’ll see an article about how it’s just around the corner to clone one.

        • neuropean@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lol, it’s click-bait garbage.

          Sure, we’ve sequenced the genome, but they’ve tried somatic cell nuclear transfer only to find out that the cell dies with the mammoth nucleus. Unless it was stored in cryogenic storage beneath lead shielding to protect from ionizing background radiation it’ll never work.

          The only hope they have is cloning huge sections of the mammoth genome into the elephant genome, which is a project the size and scale of which will never be performed if we can’t even be fucked to properly care for their only surviving relative the elephants (or even care enough to do anything about global warming for that matter).

    • neuropean@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ethical research guidelines bar any attempts to culture human embryos beyond 14 days of gestation, so as usual it’s clickbait and not something that will be explored anytime soon.