Thank you sir, I didn’t know the way to fix ailing welfare states was to make ChatGPT available to all.

It is truly the ultimate technofix.

    • loobkoob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh, they won’t be issues. Well be drinking Compute straight from the can, and all our appliances will run on direct Compute inputs. You’ll get home from your job earning 10 Compute/hr at the Compute factory, pay the standard 120 Compute charge to unlock your front door, hop onto your Compute Generation Dynamo for an hour to power the oven, and then settle down on the sofa for the evening to see what’s on Soravision - discounted to 7 Compute/hr for GPT+ subscribers.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “ChatGPT 7, please make me a sandwich, I’m hungry.”

    As an AI language model, I cannot make a sandwich or any food for you.

    However, because you have indicated that you are broke af, which is illegal in the State of Missouri, this conversation and your IP address has been reported to the state police.

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    What you get is not dollars, but like productivity.

    Interesting. Interesting theory Altman.

    What if the dollars paid for that productivity went to the people who generated that productivity, perhaps?

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And remove those dollars from those who have the most of them?! What are you, actually crazy?! You’re clearly crazy.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Clearly the dollars should go to the people who tell others what to do, and thus stand at the base of increasing productivity, how else would the plebs know what to do. A telling others what to do economy, or perhaps if you will a command economy.

    • Jerkface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What if we had something to represent that productivity? Like, pieces of paper in various denominations. You could just trade them for whatever goods or services you needed.

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Likely already happened years ago, but hasn’t been made public yet.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hasn’t there been internal email and chat logs leaked showing that he knows he’s completely full of shit and just trying to make the most fucking money at any cost?

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sam Altman is trying to equate compute time with value but fails to see that value can be traded for goods and necessities. Wtf a lumberjack, carpenter, mechanic, plumber, steel worker going to do with compute?

    • Evinceo@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is Sam “WorldCoin” Altman we’re talking about, I’m sure he assumes they can mine crypto with it.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is part one of enshittification: You give your service away to get users, and cater to their wishes. Then once they’re hooked you can do whatever you want because they can’t leave.

    Just more technofeudalism from a technofeudalist.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s more insidious: it’s not giving it away. it’s subverting the “hmm UBI is good actually” argument and saying that people should receive compute instead of money, with a quiet “oh and naturally someone will have to pay us for providing them that compute”

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        not that I’d bet against them pulling a lock-in move down the line as well (or upsells or any number of other exploitation plays), mind you

  • froztbyte@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    so when you can’t get the retail and/or enterprise markets to give you enough money to get dem gainz you were hoping for on your grift, ah yes naturally it should be government money that bails you out. got it.

  • Fermion@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is he trying to reframe the concept of a free trial as if it’s some altruistic thing?

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I will be so happy when we stop hearing about this “AI” nonsense for literally everything. The only good thing is that at least there are less wankers trying to throw “block chain” into everything