• redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s just math and the relentless march of technology. Fear not, we have lots of open source post quantum cryptography libraries.

      • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The point in time after the first qbit based supercomputers transitioned from theoretical abstraction to physical proven reality. Thus opening up the can-of-worms of feasabily cracking classical cryptographic encryptions like an egg within human acceptable time frames instead of longer-than-the-universes-lifespan timeframes… Thanks, superposition probability based parallel computations.

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        From Wikipedia:

        Post-quantum cryptography, sometimes referred to as quantum-proof, quantum-safe, or quantum-resistant, is the development of cryptographic algorithms that are currently thought to be secure against a cryptanalytic attack by a quantum computer.

          • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            RSA 1024 is post quantum if you want to ignore progress in cryptography and use current algorithms. (We have no quantum computers that can crack it right now)

            It’s about preparing for quantum computers by using algorithms that are secure against conventional and future quantum computers. If you assume that a quantum computer will exist that can crack RSA 2048/4096, then all data that gets send right now can be decrypted at that time. If we get working quantum computers in 20 years then in 20 years all banking data, chat messages, emails,… send with RSA today can be compromised.
            If we switch to algorithms that don’t get easier to crack with quantum computers then even when they get strong enough nothing will change and only data send with older algorithms can be decrypted.

            See also the rest of the Wikipedia article, here a continuation of my previous snippet:

            Most widely used public-key algorithms rely on the difficulty of one of three mathematical problems: the integer factorization problem, the discrete logarithm problem or the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem. All of these problems could be easily solved on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm or possibly alternatives.

            As of 2024, quantum computers lack the processing power to break widely used cryptographic algorithms; however, because of the length of time required for migration to quantum-safe cryptography, cryptographers are already designing new algorithms to prepare for Y2Q or Q-Day, the day when current algorithms will be vulnerable to quantum computing attacks.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Can they? Can they really break RSA 4096? Because the algorithm we have to do that just turns it from 256 bits of entropy to 128, which is still not breakable.

          • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Algorithms. Plural. Shor’s and Grover’s. Nothing public that can break anything in use but progress marches on and governments are always expected to be 5-10 years ahead

            • Kairos@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Hm. It appears I did not know about Shor’s. :/ sorry.

              Although I’m willing to bet that it requires an exponential amount of correction qbits.