• sarge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well, now I’d like to learn what differences between the US and the Australian Healthcare System are!

    Why is Australia so damn high up?

    • sarge@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Turns out it seems the Australians have public health insurance for everyone - Medicare. And you have optional additional private insurance. Communism I guess. Surely wouldn’t workout for the US…

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Turns out it seems the Australians have public health insurance for everyone - Medicare.

        To follow from your comment , because Australia has a publicly funded health system, the government actively works to reduce preventable diseases because it reduces the load on the system.

        So they have had:

        A sunscreen campaign and skin cancer check initiatives since the '80s.

        Anti-smoking campaigns (and high tobacco taxes) where resources are available to help quit.

        Every citizen gets a free bowel cancer test mailed to them when they turn 50 to help find and treat cancer earlier.

        Road safety laws are tight and helmet / seatbelt regulations are strict as it reduces hospital loads.

        Vaccinations for a multitude of easily preventable diseases are given for free in childhood, particularly now for the virus that causes cervical cancer.

        Those and a myriad of other public health initiatives all help Australians to live longer.

        Coupled with the fact that the cost for the whole population is borne by an income tax of approximately 2% , it means that if you are poor or unemployed, you still have access to health services. That also means that small health issues among low income earners don’t snowball until they are life threatening.

        It has the knock on effect that people don’t end up trapped in a job because it offers “good benefits and a low deductible” and concerns about pre existing conditions interfering with insurance and etc when changing jobs is generally moot.

        Then throw in mandatory government regulated retirement funds that require all employers to put in 12+ percent of an employee’s gross earnings into an employee’s fund of their choosing for their retirement. That coupled with public health generally means the whole US style worker=slave arrangement can’t exist.

        Which means the US will get nothing like this as all that screams of nanny state overlords and death panels and moar taxes killing freedom and so on and so forth. Sorry guys.

        • sarge@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          TY! It really wasn’t on my screen… Think I‘ll dive deeper into this. Thanks again for the effort!