Scientists discovered that removing specific molecules from developing mice can completely reverse their sex from male to female.

    • tal@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t know enough about the state of genetic engineering to speak with much authority on the topic, but I don’t think that we today have a mechanism to modify the genes in all the cells of a many-celled organism.

      Like, I don’t think that this has practical applications as an alternative to hormone replacement therapy or something, if that’s what you’re saying; it’d be used at the single-cell stage, so that the changes propagate as the cells replicate and the organism grows.

      You could maybe create a younger, female clone of yourself, but I assume that that’s not what you’re after.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Also, these changes wouldn’t necessarily change an adult body to a different sex even if you did reprogram every cell. It’s merely the step that determines the way the rest of development unfolds. But once that development happens, much of it is irreversible (at least within the human genome and its available tools).

        It might someday be possible to build a whole new package of genetic machinery to change a person’s sex completely but this is far beyond current technology since nothing like this exists in the human body or any animal remotely similar to humans. It would have to be created from scratch, while most genetic engineering today is more or less cutting and pasting from other organisms or breaking shit to see what happens (as in this research).

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            A little but not as much was we would want. I was thinking about mentioning that but it’s in tadpoles as well so it’s not even clear a similar process could work for adults. Still, it’s a place to start the research.

        • tal@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Like, growing a female clone of parts of your body, and then implanting organs from it into your body? That’s creative. I dunno, good question.

          I don’t know whether immune rejection of cloned organs is an issue or not. I guess it’d be comparable to implanting an organ from an identical twin.

          kagis

          Sounds like that’s possible, at least in terms of immune response.

          https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-and-preventing-organ-transplant-rejection-4147557

          Isograft: This type of transplant is done between a genetically identical donor and a recipient, such as an identical twin. There is virtually no risk of rejection in this case, as the body does not recognize an identical twin’s organ as foreign.

          thinks

          I think that a problem you’d have with anything that has a lot of sensory input and output is that you’d have to regrow nerves. My understanding is that in cases of something like spinal cord damage, an issue is that scarring prevents nerves from reconnecting correctly – suppressing scar formation is something that had to happen when trying to deal with spinal cord issues. I’ve also got no idea what the constraints are on wiring things up correctly, but I imagine that there are some.

          kagis

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerve_injury

          Recovery of a nerve after surgical repair depends mainly on the age of patients. Younger the patients, better the prognosis, because of better healing capacity of young tissues. Young children can recover almost normal nerve function.[29] In contrast, a patient over 60 years old with a cut nerve in the hand would expect to recover only protective sensory function, that is, the ability to distinguish hot/cold or sharp/dull; recovery of motor function would be likely incomplete.

          So even with one’s own body parts, nerve regeneration apparently isn’t going to be perfect, but we can have some degree of it.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m not against transhumanism, but if there isn’t an attainable goal you’re just getting stuck in the trans part. I’ll let you be the test pilot.