My question is basically the title, but here are some more details.
My computer is used about 75% for work, 20% for personal use (almost entirely web), and 5% for gaming. ~2 y.o. midrange rig w/ Intel CPU, AMD graphics, 32GB DDR4 RAM.
For work, I need lots of straightforward things: video conferencing on Teams (web is fine), Zoom, Word document editing (web is fine), a bunch of other web apps, some light database stuff, etc.
Plus two things that are a bit trickier: OneDrive professional/SharePoint (so I’ll need abraunegg’s onedrive) and Excel 2024 desktop (web isn’t good enough) for which I’ll need to run Windows (10? Ameliorated, maybe?) in a VM.
But I also want to do gaming. I wouldn’t install a kernel-level rootkit anyway (and I boycott Denuvo), so SteamOS-level compatibility should work great for my needs. I also have a Quest 3, so I’ll want to do PCVR, which apparently works great (with Bazzite).
But I don’t really grok what Bazzite being immutable means for using it as a daily driver for work/productivity. Under the hood, it’s just Fedora 42, right? For immutable distros, you use flatpaks instead of apt install, and they’re basically just “apps” that should “just work”, right? Do I care about kernel modification?
Or, more to the point, I don’t know what I don’t know. After preliminary research on this all, I think my plan of going for Bazzite then adding abraunegg’s onedrive and a Windows VM with Office 2024 will hit all my needs, but can anyone “sanity check” that plan, or compare the pros/cons with a non-Ubuntu-based alternative?
I’m good enough with computers that I should be able to tinker through the inevitable small challenges that will come up, but I don’t really have enough time to do it twice if my initial plan is terrible. (I connect to a Debian server remotely using the terminal, so I have some background—but I needed to install a bunch of packages to get web app software running, and idk if I’ll need that as a desktop user.)
Any advice much appreciated! And thanks for reading this far, even if you don’t comment. :)
Edit: thanks for the input so far! I’m turning in, but I’ll read everything and reply to stuff tomorrow.
Debian is far from being a mainstream workstation distro.
Debian is/was a very good server distro but there are lots of good alternatives to debian nowadays which may be much better for someones usecase. Debian is not the ultima ratio.
What are you even talking about? Debian is fine and extremely stable, which is what you want for a work PC when your pay is on the line.
I never said debian wasn’t fine. Where do I doubt that debian wasn’t stable? Which of the bigger 10 distros isn’t stable?
Good to know! I use it at work for a server; ngl, my non-Bazzite distro search hasn’t been extensive, except getting to the point that I think I don’t want anything Ubuntu-based.
Debian isn’t Ubuntu-based, Ubuntu is Debian-based. That person is also full of shit.
I knew about the Debian > Ubuntu ordering, but I take it Debian is still often used as a desktop environment, which is what I thought.
I’d say that most systems on Debian (generally networked servers for businesses/services vastly outnumber desktop installs) are running the server version because it’s so solid and pretty light. The stable release model works well in production environments.
But yeah, the majority of desktop users are using a DE unless they’re WM-only, like me.