• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was once checking out Garuda, because the name popped up a handful of times. Outside of the absolutely repulsive front page, the moment i saw unmarked and unexplained “fun scripts” in the installer, i unplugged the installer

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Very fair. I’m a far cry from an advanced user - I know just enough to be dangerous to myself, and didn’t see that. As I said in another comment, though, I do like that the default browser is somewhat hardened and uses a decent searx instance as the default search. It does seem to be marketed towards teenagers, though, unfortunately.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not even really about how advanced you are. Using something more trustworthy, and something you can depend on, is always better. For arch(-based) distributions, i would always recommend Endeavour. Plain Arch will just do it too, if you can follow instructions as listed

          • dinckel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I wasn’t a fan of it, personally. I’ve only tried it once, because the regular install takes me less than 10 minutes start to full completion, but didn’t really like some of the opinionated choices for the setup here and there. Still appreciate that it’s there though

            • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Fair enough, I’m just saying it makes things easier for people who feel overwhelmed with the installation process shown by the arch wiki