Solidarity denotes the unity and mutual support among individuals with shared objectives, crucial in protests for reinforcing collective resolve. Protests are strategically held in high-visibility, disruptive locations to maximize impact and draw public and institutional attention. This disruption compels acknowledgment of the issues, leveraging collective action to catalyze societal and political change. In contrast, low-visibility protests are often ineffective as they fail to generate sufficient public awareness or pressure for change.

  • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    No, I believe that by thinking differently, you can change the actions that you take.

    By doing so, it changes the world.

    How else can you change a behavior?

    If you’re an alcoholic and want to stop, the first step is to think about stoping and create an environement without alcohol. Then you take the actions.

    If you want to do a protest, you first have to think about creating a protest in the world, then you take the necessary actions.

    I believe this very seriously.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re completely missing the point. By your standard, the idea creates the change, asking the ruling class to be nicer creates change. This is nonsense.

      Change comes from actions. A change in material conditions. Protesters get nothing from just being loud, they must actually be disruptive to force change.

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Forcing change is tyranical and will be short-lived.

        Nobody likes being forced to do something. If you do, you will obviously meet resistance.

        For any positive long-lasting effect, you must persuade the ruling class to be nicer.

        Ideally, the idea should come from them. Not you.

        Instead of forcing change, simply allow them to change by themselves.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Forcing the ruling class is the only way to get them to change anything.

          You cannot persuade the ruling class to be nicer. They will always act in their material interests, with no regard for morality.

          You are nearly a solipsist.

          • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Maybe I am.

            I think most people believe only hard power exists. Coercion. Force. Strength. Control. Etc.

            I’m not denying it.

            All I’m saying is that there is also power in patience, softness, morality, cooperation, etc.

              • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I believe both can be useful in their own situations.

                It seems to me that you have much to learn.

                  • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Of course, I do have much things to learn.

                    But I’ve seen and dealt with people like you before.

                    Disruption. Change. Force. Chaos. Attention.

                    I get it.

                    I just don’t feel I have much to learn here.