• tisktisk@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is shocking to hear. I’m also extremely spooked that no experts have even attempted to dispute these claims. Was he really just some pseudo-academic celebrity? Is he merely the OG Jordan Peterson?

    • steventrouble@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Haha, don’t worry, he was definitely not some kind of Jordan Peterson. JP intentionally abuses his popularity to spread hatred.

      I don’t think Chomsky was as intentional about it. He just had opinions and happened to talk about them in a reassuring, intellectual tone. It’s more of a systemic issue, in that other people spread his ideas without thinking scientifically about them. I think it’s not healthy for the field that people idolize him so much. It makes it harder for linguistics to move toward the scientific method.

      Hope this helps clarify.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I think there is also something structural about academia, at least culturally, that supports the kind of monolithic views of how things work, even when they’ve never been shown to be demonstrated by the evidence. Linguistics is far from the only field where I’ve seen this scenario play out.