Is it unfathomable that someone could see something they think is wrong but doesn’t think starting a long-winded Internet argument wherein neither party will in any scenario whatsoever convince the other of anything is worth their time?
I think it’s representative of intellectual cowardice which is why I made my comment. It is entirely consistent with my experience when commenting on a .world post and calling out Liberalism’s “true face”.
It seems you would rather have this meta argument about posting etiquette then actually address any substantive policy or historical arguments so I’m not sure you are making the point you think you are
Is it unfathomable that someone could see something they think is wrong but doesn’t think starting a long-winded Internet argument wherein neither party will in any scenario whatsoever convince the other of anything is worth their time?
I think it’s representative of intellectual cowardice which is why I made my comment. It is entirely consistent with my experience when commenting on a
.worldpost and calling out Liberalism’s “true face”.Pack it up, fellas. Not wanting to start Internet arguments is now “intellectual cowardice”.
It seems you would rather have this meta argument about posting etiquette then actually address any substantive policy or historical arguments so I’m not sure you are making the point you think you are
Nah, I’ve said all I wanted to say have a good day
They’re right, you’ve got nothing and you know it