starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agoAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devimagemessage-square306fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devstarman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square306fedilink
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoLower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
minus-squareDog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
minus-squareKazumara@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-24 days agoI would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
Lower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
I would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024