• bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You think LM being “too old” is a problem for newbies? I’ve been running some distro or other since RedHat 5. I it took me 6 weeks of waiting for Fedora to sort out most of the issues, (and I STILL have some minor ghosting issues and I ain’t no gamer), and 4 tries to get Fedora 40 to successfully take the nVidia drivers for the GTX1650 chipset in my laptop.

    You think a new wannbe convert is going to put up with that?

  • rozodru@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I only just switched to Linux this past week and I use Mint. It was suggested to me by someone here on lemmy. It was easy to set up, customize, and get all my stuff working on it. I have World of Warcraft, Final Fantasy XIV, Elden Ring and a few other games all working on it. The only issue, and right now it’s a minor one, I’m having is the 535 nividia drivers can cause random stutters/lag every now and then but nothing major.

    My point is for people like me who are new to linux and don’t want to get overwhelmed I think Mint is great. I know eventually i’ll change to a different more “advanced” distro, right now I have my eye on CachyOS, but I don’t think I’m there quite yet to confidently install it.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because for most use cases, Mint works flawlessly. It changes little from time to time. It has all the drivers to get started with a wide range of common hardware. It has all the codecs to play common media formats.

    Of course if the package update is too slow, it’s not for you, but then unlike you, most people don’t need the latest and greatest. They just need something that works from the get-go with predictable behavior.

  • gerdesj@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Mint has managed to become a meme and that’s no bad thing, per se, but it can look a bit odd to the cognoscenti. Anyone doing research by search engine looking to escape MS towards Linux will find Mint as the outstanding suggestion.

    That’s just the way it is at the moment: Mint is the gateway to Linux. Embrace that fact and you are on the way to enlightenment.

    I am the MD of a small IT company in the UK. I’ve run Gentoo and then Arch on my daily drivers for around 25 years. The rest of my company insist on Windows or Apples. Obviously, I was never going to entice anyone over with Gentoo or even Arch, although my wife rocks Arch on her laptop but I manage that and she doesn’t care what I call Facebook and email.

    We are now at an inflection point - MS are shuffling everyone over to Azure with increasing desperation: Outlook/Exchange and MS Office will be severely off prem. by around 2026. So if you are going to move towards the light, now is a good time to get your arse in gear.

    I now have Kubuntu on my work desktop and laptop. You get secure boot out of the box, along with full disc encryption and you can also run a full endpoint suite (ESET for us). That scores a series of ticks on the Cyber Essentials Plus accreditation and that is required in my world.

    AD etc: CID - https://cid-doc.github.io/ pretty nifty. I’ve defined the equivalent of Windows drive letters as mounts under home, eg: ~/H: - that works really well.

    Email - Gnome Evolution with EWS. Just works. Used it for years.

    Office - Libre Office. I used to teach people how to use spreadsheets, word processors, databases and so on. LO is fine. Anyone attempting to tell me that LO can’t deal with … something … often gets … educated. All software has bugs - fine, we can deal with that. I recently showed someone how decimal alignment works. I also had to explain that it is standard and not a feature of LO.

    For my company the year of Linux on the desktop has to be 2025 (with options on 2026). I have two employees who insist on it now and I have to cobble together something that will do the trick. I get one attempt at it and I’ve been doing application integration and systems and all that stuff for quite a while.

    Linux has so much to give as an ecosystem but we do need to tick some boxes to go properly mainstream on the desktop and that needs to happen sooner rather than later.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Because you’re dealing with lifelong windows users who want a reassuringly familiar looking OS not fucking linux techs

    Jesus christ learn to tailor to the user

  • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    You are right, I wanted to do some nodejs and realized that the package in the repo was Node version 12.something while latest node is version 20.something.

    Also they still ship Python 3.10 which is ancient technology by today’s standard, luckily nothing major is added between 3.10 and 3.12

    Their mirrors are worst, ALL OF SELECTABLE OPTIONS FROM MIRROR SELECTOR which shows up at 47 KB/sec which just hurts your area spanning from asshole to large intestines.

    I use bridgetide linux mint mirror btw

    So why am I not switching?

    Here is why: Linux mint is based on Ubuntu meaning that you can add Ubuntu repos or ppas or whatever they need directly into Linux Mint and dont have to worry about it breaking.

    Say that you need to have some software for a reason and you cannot find one in Flatpak or an appimage, etc. You will be happy to realize that many of these software are built for Ubuntu and provide their deb package with own repo with updates.

    I run Linux Mint 21.3 and that means I can just use a program built for Ubuntu Jammy as Linux Mint Virginia is based on Ubuntu Jammy. If I need to install something out of repo, I can just go and install Ubuntu jammy deb package and it will work normally.

  • olafurp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Anybody that already has had a computer for 2 years and is coming from Windows will have almost no problems with Mint. Stability is top priority for first time Linux users and you need some visual guide with screenshots. Mint also has a great default look and setup for people coming from Windows. Mint is probably the best distro to put on your mom’s old laptop that is “getting slow” because of viruses.

    I’d recommend KDE Neon or Ubuntu also depending on the situation but if I don’t know anything about the person and computer I’d say Mint.

  • Mereo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Which is why I ask people one simple question: do they plan to game. If they plan to game, I don’t recommend them Mint. If they aren’t, I recommend them Mint.

  • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mint works. Most alternatives don’t. I can install Mint on a total newbie’s system, and not have to worry about something breaking two weeks later. Hell, most newbies can install Mint if you give them the USB.

    On a deeper level, I think Mint devs are one of the few teams that understand the ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ philosophy.

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because Fedora is open source only to the point of it being pathological. If there isn’t am open source driver most time you’re just boned. Someone new is going to have a tough time with it, and the community is on average a very “lol rtfm” bunch. Not as bad as Arch, but that’s not saying much.

    Meanwhile, despite the problems around Ubuntu, Debian communities are much more understanding and helpful. Mint even with old packages is going to be an easier time for a newbie. Certainly a newbie unfamiliar with the way entirely too much of the FOSS community is.

    • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      To be fair arch has amazing docs, and even a rube like me can follow it decently well. I found endeavor to be the easiest distro to use. But agreed the attitude isn’t great.

      • Billegh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Arch is absolutely divine with its documentation. There is a bit of a “you must be this tall to ride” with them though. Like the tiny [AUR] link. That’s not really well explained, and is even more opaque if you follow the link.

  • jjhanger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    For me, the systems I’ve installed Mint on for people, haven’t had any problems at this current time. While I have never had an issue using Fedora myself(never been interested enough in OpenSUSE to keep with it when I’ve tried it), I’ll never recommend Fedora in similar cases where I’ve installed Mint. The machines were older and the users aren’t Linux enthusiasts. They just want a working machine to do basic tasks without breaking their bank to get a new machine when their Windows OS reached EOL.

    However I can’t confirm or explain why the people you say that are doing this challenge are having problems. I don’t know their hardware specs and I don’t know them so I don’t know what they know about Linux.

    (Please note, to all Mint users, I’m not saying Mint is only for non-Linux enthusiasts. I love how Mint is good for the non-enthusiasts and enthusiasts alike).

  • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I installed Mint (no idea mint was old tbh) looked into Gentoo and tried the live boot USB option. 'This looks nice, no how do I install" The install option opened a web page (gentoo wiki) with several options for guides based on various permutations. All options send you in a ring without actually telling me how to install.

    I went back to Mint as it does the few things I need a PC to do these days:

    Some kind of office suite with spreadsheet and word processor, Steam, Netflix and Prime, Firefox

    Added bonus is that it runs MegaMek natively AND i don’t need to read pages of documentation, just click install.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Added bonus is that it runs MegaMek natively

      This is always a fun thing to read in the wild. Keep on stompin’, MechWarrior! O7 (salute)

      Gentoo might have been quite a leap! :p I wanna try it some day as a challenge but it’s def intimidating.

      I run Tumbleweed on my main rig and love how crazy stable it is for being cutting edge. Endeavour OS is also cool for this. Both great communities too.

      But agree with you on Mint. It’s just a really nice smooth experience. So far it’s on my “little media laptop I won’t update much, need to be reliable, and will probably hand to family on occasion”, and I can trust it’s just gonna work.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well you went from one of the easiest to one of the more complicated distros so thats not surprising. There’s a lot of distros thst are just as simple to install as mint, you don’t need to mess around with arch and gentoo unless you’re planning on becoming a real Linux enthusiast.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      All options send you in a ring without actually telling me how to install.

      Don’t know. I was installing Gentoo in 6th grade of school with poorly-translated gentoo handbook.

      EDIT: had wrong quote

      • menemen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If it doesn’t provide a benefit for them, why should they bother? I understand why a teenager would, I would have as a teenager. But as an adult? Who got time for this?

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It was counterpoint to “send you in a ring without actually telling me how to install”. It does.

          I also agree that installing it is rather lengthy.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why the fuck would you try Gentoo as a Linux noob? I am guessing no one told you it was for advanced Linux users only. Fedora and OpenSUSE are nowhere near as difficult to install as Gentoo, as they are made for normal users.

      • Evrala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Gentoo was my second linux Distro ever some time in 2003 or 2004.

        Installed it by printing out the full install doc, which was like 30 or 40 pages, and starting up a stage one install. I got through the entire install by following the instructions because the documentation was that good.

        I remember having a problem and hopping on an irc chat to ask for help and people there being baffled about the basic level questions I was asking while having a working Gentoo install.

        • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, even the “difficult” distributions tend to just be a matter of following instructions to get a working installation. Gentoo was a massive PITA to maintain though. Chances are I was missing some knowledge that would’ve simplified things, but I spent way too much time on maintenance for the system to actually be useful. Arch has been much kinder.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          and starting up a stage one install.

          Dear Faust.

          Difficulty:

          • Easy
          • Medium
          • Hard
          • Nightmare
          • > Novichok

          I thought you went with minimalcd, opened handbook in links(browser) and installed stage3.

          I remember having a problem and hopping on an irc chat to ask for help and people there being baffled about the basic level questions I was asking while having a working Gentoo install.

          Self-perpetuating circle of “Gentoo is not for noobs” stereotype.

  • Antitoxic9087@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The moemorphic character shown in the picture is Archchan, created by ravimo. I wonder why show her in a discussion about Mint?

      • okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        This was news to me as well, but I assume that the Arch Linux logo in question suggests that it might be strange to use an Arch Linux specific illustration, for something that isn’t mentioning Arch Linux.

        Did that clear it up, or were you just being rude?