• Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fairly successful strategy I’ve been using lately is to out-crazy the red team and feed em their own medicine. No one here needs to be told the libertarian party is just Far Right Lite™, but do you know their selling points? Cuz there is no chance in HELL I’ll be able to convince a Trumpanzee to vote for Biden, but I have been able to steer a handful of votes away from Trump and toward Chase Oliver - usually goes down like this: MAGAt will open the conversation by bitching about someone on the blue team - such as Hillary and her emails. I’ll AGREE with them, but lump her and Trump into the same category… “Idk how they get away with sending classified data on a private email server or printing it out and hauling boxes of it to their private residence. If I did hundredth of the crime Trump or Hillary committed, I’d spend the rest of my life in jail!”. Bitch about how both parties are doing the bare minimum just to stay in power etc; then start pitching 3rd as an alternative option.

    ‘Both sides’ em, and change their vote to “not trump” by pitching whichever 3rd most closely aligns with their impressionability (which is pretty much always the LP). Put the spoiler effect to good use.

    And be weary of folks doing the same to you, especially here on Lemmy with all the ‘genocide Joe’ shit or encouraging apathy because of the shit debate.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      And be weary of folks doing the same to you, especially here on Lemmy with all the ‘genocide Joe’ shit or encouraging apathy because of the shit debate.

      I’m already quite weary of that!

      (“Weary” means tired; you probably meant “wary” which means cautious)

      • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Poor you. You think Biden’s victims are weary? He’s killed up to one hundred thousand innocent people in agonising ways, and you’re weary of him being described as what he is.

        Shame on you.

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So, Trump is better? Yeah, we know he sucks. We also know Trump is far, far worse. But you know this, don’t you?

          What is your plan, exactly? By not voting Biden, you help Trump, and he WILL directly cause far more death and suffering.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      What else do you call someone complicit in the genocide of a sovereign nation for the sole purpose of furthering a blatantly-supremacist regime? Other than Amerikan, I mean?

    • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      And be weary of folks doing the same to you, especially here on Lemmy with all the ‘genocide Joe’ shit

      You’ve seen the broken, burnt, limbless and decapitated bodies of twenty-thousand plus dead children, live-tweeted into your living room for nine months and it isn’t enough for you to stop supporting the man principally responsible for it.

      You’re not “defeating fascism”, you are a fascist.

        • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          at least I’m not a Russian rent boy.

          You think this is worse than being a genocidal fascist. Says everything.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Backing genocide isn’t better.

          There is no harm-reduction past a certain point, there is just throwing vulnerable people under the bus to save yourself.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I honestly have no idea what the logic is supposed to be here?

            Are we supposed to be so virtuous that we allow Republicans to kill all of us just so we die with the Palestinians that no matter who we elect will die!? It makes absolutely no sense.

            We can talk in 2028 when we actually have a say again in who is running, but as it stands now we’re stuck with who is up there now.

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              No, we’re not.

              The convention hasn’t happened yet.

              Finally, the logic is simple. Biden is a genocidal fascist. If you’re afraid that we will live in a fascist state if Trump is elected, then my answer is we already do.

              If Trump is elected and goes full fascist, what do you plan on doing? Whatever it is, you should already be doing it.

              Are we supposed to be so virtuous that we allow Republicans to kill all of us just so we die with the Palestinians that no matter who we elect will die!? It makes absolutely no sense.

              Resisting fascism and genocide isn’t about virtue. It’s about survival. You’ve been conned into believing that if you just vote for the lesser genocidal fascist, then you or whatever oppressed group you identify with will be fine. You will not.

              This well known poem

              First they came for the Communists
              And I did not speak out
              Because I was not a Communist
              Then they came for the Socialists
              And I did not speak out
              Because I was not a Socialist
              Then they came for the trade unionists
              And I did not speak out
              Because I was not a trade unionist
              Then they came for the Jews
              And I did not speak out
              Because I was not a Jew
              Then they came for me
              And there was no one left
              To speak out for me
              

              is about you.

            • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Are we supposed to be so virtuous that we allow Republicans to kill all of us just so we die with the Palestinians that no matter who we elect will die!?

              Translation: “I’ve already acquiesced to the idea that one way or the other, the flag I eagerly uplift is going to literally inflict genocide upon a sovereign nation for natural gas resources and the allowance of an illegitimate, blatantly-supremacist nationstate to build itself atop those sovereign bodies the exact same way Amerika did to the natives, and I see nothing wrong with that so long as my comfort is preserved”

              You and everyone like you fucking disgust me. Death to the settler empire, worse to those who uplift it.

              We can talk in 2028 when we actually have a say again in who is running,

              “just one more genocider guys I swear, just one more mass murderer; just four more years of settler bullshit” y’all run this exact same play every four fucking years like clockwork you disgust me. I can smell the compatibility on you you dog

              • Asafum@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                Oh fuck off. I have no real options here. I vote against the establishment asshole every primary I get.

                • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  So you recognise that the system is the problem. You even think there’s a gun to your head forcing you to participate. You don’t need to take part in it. Taking part of choosing complicity.

                • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Do you organize with an actual party with revolutionary (not reformist) politics? Have you ever cut a check for a political prisoner’s bond, bail, or commissary? Perform any kind of community mutual aid? If not, this “oh fuck off” is petulance as impotent as the only thing you claim you do, and deeply unserious as far as any real response could be considered.

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    They say your time is much better spent guaranteeing people who already will vote blue show up to polls than trying to change the opinion of people who will vote red.

    So that looks like asking people “do you have a plan to vote?” And perhaps in a less nosy phrasing: “When will you vote?” “How will you get there?”

    People verbalizing a plan makes them more likely to follow through.

    There are many places you can sign up to go canvassing, which is great. I would suggest in addition to and maybe before that, make a list of everyone you know and would feel comfortable talking to, and talk to them about voting. You will get much more mileage from existing relationships. (It’s like how sales differentiates a warm lead and a cold lead)

    Once you’ve exhausted that list then every little bit still helps. I do think high density events like farmers markets, community gatherings, concerts, games, etc have better rate of contact than door to door.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I realize I just essentially said to tell people to vote while you were asking for something more. I wanted to share that because some people think that posting “vote” is the same as having a conversation about voting. Posting is not nearly as effective.

      Another thing that might help is directly asking elected officials to intervene. Staffers for politicians keep a tally of calls and letters they receive for/against a given issue. So while your words may not move an elected, you and some friends can get them to act on an issue. If you have a group you can also request a meeting to discuss your issue which is even more effective. Politicians take notice of organized groups of constituents since that’s a block of votes for/against them and possible a group knocking doors for/against them.

      The trouble is I don’t know what the ask is. There should be a specific action you’re demanding: “introduce this bill” “cosponsor this bill” “vote for/against this bill”. And it has to be something they’re able to do. I don’t know what that thing would be.

      Pack the supreme court (but there’s not time for that or majority in the house).

      Long term I think building true power means growing communities, joining unions and cooperatives. Most of us aren’t rich or powerful enough to be heard, which is why organizing is so important. None of this is fair or easy to do.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      They each served one term. Just compare their actions.

      Biden rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement, revoked the Keystone Pipeline permit, created a 13 million acre federal petroleum reserve for Alaskan wildlife, greatly increased oil site lease cost, signed $7B in solar subsidies, invested $66B in passenger rail, enacted the Inflation Reduction act to support clean energy, increased energy efficiency standards on cars, appliances, and industry, created new permitting rules to streamline transmission lines, leveraged the NLRB for an FTC ruling that eliminated non-compete agreements, capped credit card late fees, reduced or outlawed junk fees in several industries, forgave billions in student debt from predatory loans, created the CHIPS Act to improve reliance on domestic technology, reenacted Net Neutrality, repealed Title 42, ended the Muslim Ban, reinstated the law prohibiting Israeli settlement on Palestinian territory, signed the Equality Act for LGBTQ+ rights, restored gay rights to beneficiaries, pardoned thousands of gay veterans from being convicted based on their sexual orientation, reenacted trans care anti-discrimination law, signed the Respect for Marriage Act, enabled unspecified gender on US Passports, rejoined WHO, banned medical debt from credit reports, currently rescheduling marijuana, is actively reducing drug costs with the American Rescue Plan Act…

      Trump repealed 112 climate regulations, left the Paris Climate Agreement, disbanded the pandemic response team stalling national pandemic response, left the WHO, repealed trans care anti-discrimination law, repealed gay rights to beneficiaries, enacted Title 42 and the Muslim ban, repealed the law prohibiting Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory, repealed Net Neutrality, provided tax cuts to the wealthy that further widened our already exploitative wealth inequality, increased tariffs on goods costing the consumers, seated the conservatives in SCOTUS that repealed Roe v. Wade…

      • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Never let it be forgotten that Roe v. Wade was struck down during a Democrat administration.

        And that klansman-adjacent segregationist will never be forgiven for the '94 Crime Bill; beyond that, he still hasn’t ended the 1033 Program, hasn’t ended the reckless militarization of lynch-mob police, hasn’t pardoned the 61 political prisoners in Atlanta facing federal RICO charges for protesting Genocide Joe’s pet project Cop Cities. He ain’t our ally, no matter how many little puff pieces of legislation he pushes of the lapdogs, bootlickers, and nepo-babies that do nothing to rectify the shit-sorry state of Amerika’s material conditions.

        What was it y’all slandered that imperial sheepdog Bernie for? Your boy Brandon might as well have renamed a post office for all the good he’s doing the subjects-of-empire. I don’t give the first fuck about the lapdogs of imperialism getting their scraps, where the fuck is the equality and actual liberation that doesn’t require tapdancing like a minstrel for genocidal settlers?

        • sweng@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Never let it be forgotten that Roe v. Wade was struck down during a Democrat administration

          Ok, but what does that have to do with said denocrat administration? What say did they have in the matter? What could they have done to change the outcome?

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            If you absolutely had to stay loyal to the Democrat party for some reason, he could’ve packed the courts like the democrats that call themselves “progressive” were telling him to do from day one of his administration, which said “progressives” were told it was ‘bad form’. Hell, Democrats have been using Roe v. Wade and similar protective legislation for women as carrots to dangle in front of the electorate ever since the Drone King; remember how the Violence Against Women act was supposed to be one of that minstrel’s priorities during his first hundred days, only for it to become “no longer a priority” after he got his seat?

            But the correct answer would have been to divest from the party. To have made it clear that literal fucking genocide is the red line of any actual human with an actually-international slate of morals. To walk away, and make them earn your support– which you and those like you will never do, because you’re spineless dogs waiting for the next table scraps to fall from the genocider’s plate.

            You, and everyone like you chose wrong; in unforgivable ways. I eagerly await your society’s collapse, me and the rest of the subjects-of-empire y’all tread on day-in, and day-out.

            • sweng@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’m not even american, so I’m not sure what you arw on about right now. All I asked was how Roe v. Wade being repealed was Biden’s fault, and the answer apparently is that he did not pack the court.

              How genocide fits into Roe v. Wade, or how callling me names somehow helps I’m still unsure of.

              • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                All I asked was how Roe v. Wade being repealed was Biden’s fault, and the answer apparently is that he did not pack the court.

                Didn’t pursue codification into law in his first hundred days just like the Drone King failed to do so with the Violence against Women Act; didn’t make use of the fact that the Constitution makes no limits on how many supreme court justices can exist on the bench at one time while he had an iron clad majority at the start of his administration, and now has the TEMERITY to use it as one of the new cudgels for this election cycle. “Oh, we’ll definitely codify it into law THIS time” yeah sure that’s what was said about VAWA.

                I spit on him, I spit on everybody who runs interference for him, I spit on everybody who bears his water. The reason genocide comes up is because THAT IS WHAT HE IS. With his arming and tacit support of Israel, he is the same kind of genocidal trash Netanyahu and the rest of the IDF are; and that fact actually matters more to me than Amerikans and the health and well-being of such. The fact that the people who still want me to see them as my countrymen have accepted genocide as a negotiable disgusts me so goddamn much that I don’t even see anyone who does so as human anymore.

                And because you’re out here running interference for that cracker, I see you no different. Give a fuck where you come from; if you’re ‘not’ Amerikan, fuck are you running your mouth like one? Keep your mark ass out the process.

                • sweng@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Didn’t pursue codification into law in his first hundred days j

                  As (again) a non-american, doesn’t that require both chambers to support the legislation?

        • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Striking down Roe v Wade was not an act of the Democrat administration. It was struck down by a Republican supreme court.

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            A republican supreme court he could have simply packed. I thought he had enough moderates to forcibly bump up the number of justices, what’s good? Don’t have all that backup that you tell us you have? At that point the court wouldn’t have been republican-controlled; but I guess the democrat party makes more money losing than they do shaking off their martyr complex and actually putting in work for the people that got them elected.

            But y’know, the Democrat party’s genocide-enablers and the Toms that mislead for them keep telling us they don’t need the actual left in this country. You made your bed; now fuckin die in it.

            • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t think Manchin and Sinema would go for court packing. And I’d count on zero republicans to vote with that. Who exactly are these moderates you were thinking of?

              • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Every single peckerwood that persecuted the squad, all those genocide-enablers Biden would’ve rather worked with to ship ammo, weapons, and assorted materiel to an illegitimate supremacist state, y’know, those so-called “moderates”. What’s good, you-- [gasp] didn’t have the support you thought you did? Color me shocked.

                Almost like when your party repeatedly, routinely disavows the only part of the nation’s political system that thinks forward, you lose your chances for everything from legislation to re-election!

                • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Who the fuck do you think you’re talking to? I’m saying those moderates don’t exist, that that support doesn’t exist for packing the court. You’re blaming me for saying they do exist, and that the support for packing the court wasn’t there when I said it was? But I didn’t fucking say that support was there dumbass.

        • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They didn’t ‘forget’ the genocide; they think all that small paltry shit for the imperialist lapdogs papers over genocide.

          • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            He’s a literal Nazi judging by his comment history. No wonder he supports an American presidential candidate.

            • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              As the crowd grew, a few protesters began spray painting a statue and throwing smoke bombs, obviously discrediting to the cause

              Oh, he’s one of those peckerwoods. “You only get to protest in ways that don’t draw attention and DON’T YOU DARE think about damaging property”-assed hook-assed treathounds

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Those are great and work well if you want to convince people who are leaning Biden, but if you want to convince Trump leaners, you might tweak the wordings a little. No need to mention the dangerous parts of anti-women’s rights stuff (ie. wanting to forbid abortion, thereby making women’s deaths much more likely), because that won’t convince them. The language they understand of “climate” is not “good measures”, but “I’m getting taxed and now I can’t pay my bills”. You need to speak in terms of fear, because that is what they are: afraid. Speak of fear, that the person who makes their bills higher, is actually Trump. Don’t do so by directly starting with how Trump is bad. Instead, say, interesting you vote for him, question, question more, push, but not too far… and then once you got them hooked, question them by fears. Then don’t tell them what the answer is (unless if they ask or seem to want one), but let them think. Let them figure it out. This will have a better effect.

        “Biden respects the Constitution, because he let Hunter be trialed. Biden criticised the new rule. This whereas Trump called the Constitutional courts, who were IN HIS favour, into question. With the new rule, Biden could assassinate Trump. Trump could assassinate YOU. And he’d get away with it. Under Trump’s judges, the President gets power to affect YOUR life. Do you think any president should be able to infringe on your personal life?”

        And to (very religious) Christians and (xenophobes); “As Christians, it is our Duty to be Good Neighbours. Then the Word will spread better. But can we be good neighbours, if we deny people being neighbours in the first place? If we drive out native people from their homeland? If you are a Servant of God, should you then not choose to let Palestinians have their own state, without being colonised by foreigners? Only then will the Palestinian refugees stop protesting with violence, and go back to their homelands. This is not a matter of what I think, but of what a Good Christian should see: injustice done upon us, injustice done upon them, injustice upon us all. Let us thus gather together.”

        Granted, I’m not familiar with all what happens in the USA, but perhaps those also help.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re right. This won’t convince a Trump voter to vote for Biden. They dismiss anything from “liberal news” which is every outlet besides the far-right. It’s been my experience that talking to a Trump supporter is kicking water uphill.

          I wrote that to do what Biden’s campaign is failing to do, speak to all of his accomplishments next to Trump’s “accomplishments,” in hopes of informing the discouraged, disengaged, and disenfranchised.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Haven’t you read their messaging? They are just perfectly innocent Democrat supporters who are super concerned about Biden’s chances in the election. Also they talk about Cornel West sometimes. For some reason they are not concerned about his chances in the election; they just really like what he has to say, and they’re going to vote for him. Flawless.

  • toastboy79@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Become one of Biden’s close personal advisors and remind him of his obligation to protect the constitution from insurrectionists using official acts? Sorry I’m hella salty today.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      He can’t. His only power over SCOTUS is nominating Justices in the event of a vacancy.

      Congress can, but Republicans control the House.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          That only applies to criminal prosecution. You really think Biden is going to off a dozen or so House members?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            No, because he’s a coward and an appeaser.

            Btw, your cope that it has to be the President specifically doing the acts is disagreed with by Sonya Sotomayor in her dissent where she states outright that this decision makes political assassination legal.

            But you’d know the implications better than a SC Justice who works with the fascist members of the Court, right?

            • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              So Biden can officially assassinate the entire Republican side and the supreme Court and because he was president when he ordered it, it is legal?

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes, exactly. “They were insurrectionists bent on overthrowing our government, and it was a tough, but necessary, decision to protect the nation, which is my duty as President.”

                That claim isn’t even entirely untrue.

                • Asafum@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  But Biden himself came out and spoke about the ruling (paraphrasing) “we need presidents to use their power with caution and respect the (self imposed) limitations of it. I’ll continue to do just that. The next guy might not do so and that’s concerning.”

                  Just a big ol’ shrug from Biden… “I won’t do it, but he sure as hell will.”

                  Thanks Mr.Virtue… where is all that virtue when it comes to Palestinians?

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              No. It’s new, and I haven’t seen the full transcript. I’m repeating what I’ve read in the news. Do you have a link so I can learn more?

              I understand how the President could theoretically order an assassination then pardon. That was a good point I read in another thread.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You’re absolutely correct. This is the part that has been left out of every news article I’ve read, and is undoubtedly the most concerning:

                  And some Presidential conduct-for example, speaking to and on behalf of the American people, see Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U. S. 667, 701 (2018) - certainly can qualify as official even when not obviously connected to a particular constitutional or statutory provision. For those reasons, the immunity we have recognized extends to the “outer perimeter” of the President’s official responsibilities, covering actions so long as they are “not manifestly or palpably beyond [his] authority.”

                  So it’s not just acts committed by the President, but also ordered by the President.

                  It’s also vague enough that charges can get bounced around lower courts indefinitely.

                  Thank you again for the link. I didn’t see it when I first searched.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        He can’t. His only power over SCOTUS is nominating Justices in the event of a vacancy.

        This is wrong. He can pack the courts RIGHT NOW. The Democratic party still holds the Senate. There is no requirement for there to only be nine justices.

        Edit: This does require the house changing the number of justices. So the above is incorrect.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Biden did that the House might impeach him. I mean, the surviving members of the House probably wouldn’t, but they theoretically could.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The American way. See a problem, wait until it’s too late to fix said problem, point fingers at a scapegoat for why the problem wasn’t solved earlier, and repeat.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Convention hasn’t happened yet. It literally isn’t too late for that.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The problem is that the act of swapping candidates will seem to be so entirely clueless that whoever steps up to the plate is bound to lose.

          Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. No one will spoil their chances for 2028 by being a late entry now. The democratic party is hunkering down for 4 more years of Trump is suspect.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            They are not bound to lose.

            That is a statement that is being pushed, along with the whole Biden “Over prepared” thing as a talking point to push why we have to stick with a dementia-addled genocidal asshole.

            It’s simply not a true statement. You’re stating an opinion as fact, and it’s misleading as shit.

            The second someone else gets picked is the second that they (Whoever they are) have name recognition and people will consider that person.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I hope you’re right. I want you to be right. And I agree at this point the Democratic Party ought to try - damn, they’re losing anyway so they might as well try.

              My worry is that an alternative candidate that is worth their salt AND want to run against Trump can’t be found. I hope I’m wrong.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The only clean way to do it is for Biden to step down put Kamala in by default and let anyone who wants to run in 2028 fight for the new VP spot. Most voters thought this was the plan anyways in 2020. That said Biden’s not going to step down so they aren’t doing shit.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Volunteer to help get good local politicians elected.

    Help a local charity.

    The impact will be indirect, but inpactful.

  • feoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Long shot here: Donate to charities which help people in need in predominantly Trump held districts.

    Less of a long shot: Volunteer for organizations like Vote Forward to try to reach folks. We’re all human beings at the end of the day, and appealing to people can’t hurt.

    • livingcoder@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m very curious how giving money to Trump supporters would hurt Trump? Some people are giving their last dollar to Trump and depend in charity at this point. Wouldn’t throwing money at local charities just further enable them?

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    turning off voters is the biggest reason why we don’t vote imo in this environment and there’s nothing you can do about shitty choices that the democrats will give us; but there’s things you can do to overcome the other institutional part of it; aka gerrymandering:

    setup free voting ride shares with free filling snacks in gerrymandered states that will pick each person up from home; drop them off at their polling station; pick them up from there; and then drop them off at home w/o having to wait for everyone to finish voting. the lines are VERY long and take hours in heavily gerrymandered places like houston texas and people hate voting already; so making them wait or skip dinner to vote is a non-starter.

    setup free voting phone number and/or website that will help register you to vote (not just tell you what you need to do) on your behalf and include the option to mail you a pre-filled envelope and stamp if paper registration is required. advertise it HEAVILY on all forms of media everywhere and make it clear it’s not from the government.

    then, assign a case worker to every client to ensure that the registration was completed and followup on the problems that gerrymandered places usually create to suppress votes. also get lawyers or people familiar with election laws to file inquiries on each voter’s behalf each time a gerrymandered place manages to find a reason to disqualify a voter or an employer refuses to let them off to vote and use that case worker to manage it.

    expect it to fail the first few times because people hate talking about politics so they won’t listen for the first few cycles.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The vast majority of Americans both already know how they feel about Trump and Biden and live in a solidly red or blue state. If you do want to focus on Biden, volunteer with phone banking or canvassing so that your efforts are directed to where they’ll actually matter and be organized in line with their messaging. Personally, I’d say you’re better off focusing on local races where you have more of an opportunity to come at it from a different angle and cut through people’s fortified positions. And as another user said, focus on mobilization, it’s easier to get someone who already agrees with you to register and make a plan than to convince someone to change their whole worldview.

    There are also strategies outside of electoralism, such as protests and counter-protests. You can join an organization and form tactics and strategies to subvert the right’s actions, and engage with direct action to build trust and community that could be important in the future. Form strategies while being realistic about your goals and capabilities and coordinate with others.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Who’s really going to be swayed by a phone bank? My democratic rep keeps robocalling me and sending text messages and I honestly find it more annoying than anything. This does not work in 2024.

      If someone canvassing (or a potential solicitor) knocks on my door I’m either not going to answer it or ask them to leave because I’m busy and don’t want my time taken up.

      These are totally ineffective strategies IMO.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are a few types of people that get targeted based on a voter profile, if my tiny amount of phone banking experience matches. There are the people who are probably going to vote for your party, but need a reminder because they are disengaged. Then there are swing voters that actually are on the fence and use a little information about your candidate. Like, most people don’t know much about Biden’s infrastructure package, so list off some projects nearby.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fair, and people in swing states get inundated with ads as it is. Mostly I’d say it’s more useful for mobilization than persuasion, like if you get a text reminding you when voting day is maybe someone makes it when they wouldn’t have otherwise.

        Ideally, volunteers could mean quality over quantity, less automated spam asking for money and instead actual humans responding to concerns and answering questions. Even more ideally, that could be paired with voters’ concerns being elevated and the party actually responding to them. The goal is to improve the quality of the campaign’s voter outreach, in whatever form that outreach takes.

        I’m not a fan of Biden myself but I still think it’s worth discussing general electoral strategies.

  • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    An armed rebellion. Duh.

    In fact this is the only thing that can be done. If Trump loses, he wins anyway in the form of Biden.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Biden did continue just about all of Trump’s most infamous policies. The border camps are still open, he continued to build the wall, Cop Cities are still built, the 61 political prisoners in Atlanta are still locked up under RICO charges that the Segregationist-In-Chief could’ve pardoned away… “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”; no matter who wins.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Those 61 prisoners were prosecuted under state law, which the president cannot pardon or commute. It is part of the reason that the business record investigation against Trump has outsized consequences. It was done at the state level, so even if he is reelected there is no question of him pardoning himself.

        Likewise with Cop City, it is funded by the Atlanta City Council and private entities. The federal government is not involved from what I can tell.