misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 个月前Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square360fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down130cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1989arrow-down1external-linkJust 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 个月前message-square360fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down10·8 个月前that market cap is a dumb metric to use to dictate protocol specifications
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-28 个月前wtf are you even talking about? What protocol specs? Who’s dictating what?
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·8 个月前the specifications of the bitcoin protocol require proof of work. using the market cap to dictate what the protocol specification should be is absurd.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 个月前and who’s proposing that? I picked the top in market cap to illustrate what most relevant coins are doing because most of them are irrelevant shitcoins.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·8 个月前seems like you undrestand that market cap is irrelevant to the protocol design.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 个月前Want to suggest a better one?
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·8 个月前uh… adoption, stability, code commits, forks…
what’s your point?
that market cap is a dumb metric to use to dictate protocol specifications
wtf are you even talking about? What protocol specs? Who’s dictating what?
the specifications of the bitcoin protocol require proof of work. using the market cap to dictate what the protocol specification should be is absurd.
and who’s proposing that? I picked the top in market cap to illustrate what most relevant coins are doing because most of them are irrelevant shitcoins.
seems like you undrestand that market cap is irrelevant to the protocol design.
Want to suggest a better one?
uh… adoption, stability, code commits, forks…