• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fascists are nationalists. Fascists from different nations fighting each other isn’t really infighting, that’s just like, regular fighting.

    Not something we should be fueling at any rate. Heaven forbid anyone asks about a peace plan that isn’t total victory, though.

    • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah it’s tough to find a compromise when Russia seems to go for the total victory or at least a settlement of gains and Ukraine hopes for a stalemate without border changes.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Russia has literally never intended to take and hold the whole of Ukraine. USA military intelligence has stated that this has been true since the beginning of the SMO. Your understanding of the world is inaccurate.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            It looked a lot like a feint to anyone analyzing the facts after it failed: an ultrathin column, soldier given 3 days worth of supplies, zero follow up, zero contingency. It looks like a classic feint to me.

        • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I wasn’t the one bringing up total victory. I don’t know what level of invasion is their true intention, nor claim to know.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            You deliberately misinterpreted the person who brought up total victory. The side insisting on total victory is Ukraine and the West. They are insisting that negotiations for peace can only occur after Russia is fully defeated and pushed out of Ukrainian territory. Some have gone so far as to say negotiations won’t start until Ukraine pushes Russia out of Crimea.

            • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s a big leap you have there. It’s not wise to assume alternate intentions to what I wrote as such an evaluation is not accurate. I don’t think Ukraine is attempting to reach Moscow for a total victory and I’d never make such a claim either.

              • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ok troll. You assumed the total victory spoken of by the commenter to whom you were replying was being attributed to Russia when it was actually being applied to Ukraine. Total victory for Ukraine would be a full and complete repulsion of the Russian, not an invasion of Russia.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ukraine hopes for total retreat from all claimed Ukrainian territory, not a mere stalemate. That’s hardly compromise.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s right and as long as US and western allies keep up with deliveries there is a chance for Ukraine to achieve its objectives.

          Ideally leading to Russian collapse.

          Before you get bent out of shape about it is in possible…

          Recent history does demonstrate that invading country that faces a determined opposition will generally have to go home with their dicks tucked.

          How long can Russia spin this shot at home esp as Ukraine is striking critical assets deep within Russia.

          And the west hasn’t even given Ukraine the best shit and permission to use it as needed.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            The West has given Ukraine more per year than Russia spends on its entire military, and Russia isn’t using its entire military in this conflict. Russia also hasn’t invaded Ukraine the way the US has invaded each of its failed quagmires. Russia is staying at the border. It’s a well known problem that Ukraine consists of vast wide open fields which are great for farming and impossible to defend. Russia has clearly demonstrated they have no intention of trying, so no one thinks Russia is going to suffer the same kind of defeat as the USA has. That’s just copium based on your refusal to research and understand the situation beyond news headlines.

            The West has given Ukraine most of the good shit at this point. Name some wonder weapons that Ukraine doesn’t have.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Rockets that can reach Moscow 🐸 and keep them coming.

              200 f16

              Big boy drones

              There is a lot we can give Ukraine to make Russian life very uncomfortable for a very long time. There is a lack of will.

              The West has given Ukraine more per year

              Let’s be real most of that money gets wasted on middle man corruption.

              Price of javlins magically quadrupled once us started buying rockets to send to Ukraine lol

          • davel@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Okay Brzezinski. Russia hardly faces a determined opposition: it faces a dwindling supply of forced conscripts.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well you got nothing to worry about then. Kyiv by winter?

              • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Again, USA intelligence has stated Russia has no intention of taking Kyiv.

              • davel@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                4 months ago

                I don’t think they even want Kyiv. Western Ukraine is rife of neo-Nazis, making it impossible to occupy long-term.