• swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s a lot of words about what is or isn’t a reliable source from one who doesn’t seem to know what a reliable source is. For a person of these beliefs, it is not surprising at all that his criteria seem to be:

    • anything that agrees with them is reliable
    • anything David Gerard considers unreliable is reliable because David Gerard is a big meanie and won’t include citations to HBD articles, uwu
    • anything that David Gerard or any friendly associate of David Gerard publishes is UNreliable, again because he is a meanie; see above, uwu

    Dawg, maybe you need to step back from this all. As Voltaire once said, reality has a well-known liberal bias. Your beliefs are probably just counter to reality, and the corpus of data is not in your favour.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also, billing David Gerard as “the Forrest Gump of the internet” in a tweet and not mentioning that you can plausibly blame him for the whole Musk X Grimes collab is a true fumble

                • Soyweiser@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Only one problem with this, he will not mention he edited days after publishing it, so then people go ‘sneer club is whining about X, but the article clearly says Y they are lying again!’ so hope somebody made an archive of the initial post. Wait, I can just check that. People did so interested parties could diff it.

      • Architeuthis@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s also the Julian Assange connection, so we can probably blame him for Trump being president as well.

          • mountainriver@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Gerard -> Assange -> creates Wikileaks -> Wikileaks receives and publishes hacked or leaked DNC emails -> DNC emails shows Clinton cheating Sanders in the primary -> depresses turnout among potential democratic voters in the general election -> Trump wins.

            On can question each step on how influential it’s for the next, but if one doesn’t Trump was all his fault.

            • Soyweiser@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ow right, forgot about those whole damn emails. Amazing that after that shit Trump just takes the boxes home and puts them inside his shower. But wait I hear you think. Shower, that was in the toilet. No, look again at the image behind the first row of boxes is a shower curtain (you can see on the left side the marble gets higher, as you should tile a shower (it is mandatory like that in .nl at least)) and what do we see behind that curtain on the right? More boxes! Sindriiiii!

            • Architeuthis@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Assange becomes a Russian asset because him being a low key sex pest somehow gives some European authorities cause to want to send him packing to the US where he is wanted for espionage should probably be one of the steps but in general yes.