Jack Black announced on Instagram that he’s cancelled the rest of the Tenacious D world tour and placed future projects on hiatus.

This happened after his bandmate Kyle Gass sparked controversy by commenting on the recent Donald Trump assassination attempt.

At their recent Sydney show, Kyle Gass was given a birthday cake and asked to make a wish for his 64th birthday, to which he said “Don’t miss Trump next time.”

In his later statement, Black said he was “blindsided” by his bandmate’s comment and condemned any calls for political violence.

  • Yprum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sincerely I am baffled at the take most comments have on this… Does this mean that because trump is a fucking fascist piece of shit that calls for violence against anyone he doesn’t like we have the right to call for violence against him? Just because trump is a disgusting waste of biological matter that rapes kids do we have the right to rape his kids? What the fuck is with all these comments calling coward to jack black for pointing out how out of place is such a thing to say… It’s a joke that I could do, in a group of close friends, that I know how they will take it. I’m pretty sure jack black would have found it funny in private. But in the middle of a show? Do we really need to remind people that calling for violence is not OK? Yeah we could take his comment as a joke… But what if some people in the audience are unhinged enough to take it seriously? The comment was definitely out of place. Freedom of speech has limits, and his comment is very much crossing the limit.

    Look, I’m not going to lie, if I hear trump drops dead randomly tomorrow I wouldn’t feel particularly sad (or at all) but I wouldn’t ask for him to be assassinated or call for terrorism against republicans no matter how wrong I think they are and how dangerous they can be. What the fuck… there’s so many people here hoping for a fucking asshole to be assassinated it’s kinda scary even. That’s not the solution against trump or republicans…

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guess we’ll see how you feel when trumps supreme court sanctioned death squads of deputized gravy seals are murdering and raping in your neighborhood.

      • Yprum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Don’t use fallacies to defend violence. Killing trump is not the only way to avoid that from happening. Becoming a terrorist and promoting violence against a political group contrary to your political opinion is not OK no matter how dangerous that group is. You are using the same discussion techniques that fucking maga asshats use. Seriously you don’t see the issue on the way you are defending the idea that assassinating a political opponent is the only way to defeat that opponent?

        You are defending the republican gun nutjob that went to shoot trump and accidentally killed someone else? You are saying his decision making was the kind of behaviour to glorify? The same kind of nut job that will happily join in the death squads you talk about? What the fuck, how does your brain work? How can you not see the hypocrisy of what you are saying…

        Of course that’s assuming a sincere take and not just some piece of shit bot or account made to increase violence hatred and division.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          How about we consider it self-defense and get on with it then? Trump has tried to end democracy once before, January 6th to be exact. Wasn’t justice supposed to prevail or something? No? It hasn’t yet? It likely never will? The only way to protect myself going forward then is to…? You tell us Mr. Violence is never the option, since the courts don’t work, and voting is soon to not matter.

          • Yprum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            And your proposal is that justice should prevail by a public mass shooting to kill the orange turd?

            So your thinking is that because trump tried to end democracy, now you have the right to kill him?

            The only way to defend yourself is with guns and killing those who attack you? I wonder what group of people keep proposing that…

            People like you, already defeated months before the election, saying that voting doesn’t matter, have a lot to do with the end of democracy. Go vote, make it matter.

            Shit’s real fucked, you have in the states a candidate for presidency instead of being in prison like he should. And the problem is that no one has killed him yet? No wonder that justice won’t work…

            Either you are just trying to help the orange shit posting this kind of defeatist comment on purpose or you are just as bad as a republican that keeps saying those who oppose him should be killed.

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              How many lives do you think Trump will destroy? If the answer isn’t “a lot”, you haven’t been paying attention. His supreme court justices from his last term have already started racking up one hell of a body count.

              Would you object to police officers gunning down a mass shooter rather than allow them to continue taking innocent lives? How sacred is a single life against the lives of their many potential and actual victims?

              From a purely ethical standpoint, it’s hard to argue that killing fascists is anything other than a net moral good. At the end of the day, it’s taking one life to save many, something that we accept as an unfortunate moral necessity all the time. Obviously, we prefer to exhaust other options first, but ultimately we still accept the use of violence to protect the innocent when strictly necessary.

              (I am, of course, speaking purely in terms of ethical hypotheticals here)

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It would be considered Self Defence to shoot the person who has already waved a bat at you, and just got done beating up the crowd behind them.

              In case metaphors don’t work for you; Trump already told his goons to attack the capitol because he didn’t like the results. He will do it again, letting him do so is being a defeatist like you so very much wish to be.

              As far as voting goes; I did vote, I voted for bernie in 2016, I voted for Joe in 2020. I begged for there to be anybody but Joe again this year. All I’ve learned so far is that it does not matter who I vote for, democrats will not fix anything, and they’ll actually spite you for voting for them, because in reality it helps them a whole hell of a lot more when a republican wins.

              I’m not advocating for any action to be done, but I sure can be extremely disappointed that this assassination attempt will only help him, and the fact that we have so many people and politicians like you who are sticking up for him.