What a winner.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has sworn to repeal laws that will give workers the right to ignore unreasonable out-of-hours communications from their bosses if the Coalition wins the next federal election.

    The government agreed to include a “right to disconnect” in its industrial relations bill, which was rushed through the senate last week in a last-minute deal with the Greens and crossbench.

    Ignoring suggestions it should be referred to committee for closer scrutiny, or that those amendments should have been circulated publicly, the government has since realised the bill included a mistake that could see bosses face criminal prosecution for contacting employees out of hours.

    But Mr Dutton says even corrected, the laws will be damaging to relations between employers and employees, and make the task of restarting productivity growth even more difficult.

    “If you think it’s okay to outsource your industrial relations or your economic policy to the Greens, which is what the prime minister is doing, then we are going to see a continuation of the productivity problem in our country,” Mr Dutton said.

    Former Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe warned last year that generous wage rises to close the inflation gap would only fuel it further unless they were accompanied by increases in productivity.


    The original article contains 360 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 42%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wait. Does he think this is a popular idea? Is there a majority of people out there who want worse working conditions???

    I don’t understand

    • flathead@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t get it either. Why announce it like he’s proud of it as a policy position when he could just push it through if they manage to win a majority? Who sent him out in front of the cameras to talk about it? The only thing I can think of is that maybe he’s being deliberately set up for a spill because he’s so obviously out of touch and un-electable.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not aimed at people like you or me, but at the corporate class and their media backers. The idea being, get them on board, and they’ll run a propaganda campaign for you.

      Not that they need to really, as Murdoch will almost always side with the conservatives.

      • Geobloke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not even them, it’s for all the tradies out there who are worried that they mightn’t be able to call their workers in for a bit of extra cash.

        Not sure if there is a carve out for that situation, but doesn’t mean he won’t exploit the fear

        • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          There could be a carve out, just like our trading laws: make it based on number of employees.

          Running a small business that requires less than 5 or 6 people to operate? You can call someone after hours for help if you’re desperate.

          Running a major corporate with hundreds on the payroll? GGF.

          You get my drift…

  • Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Dutton is one of those people who is clearly so nasty it has seeped out and taken over his physical appearance.

    What a goon. I mean the Liberals are the party of evil greedy lying shits anyway but he’s like an exaggerated cartoon mascot for them.

  • PetulantBandicoot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even if the law gets repealed, I still will not answer phone calls and emails from work outside of work. I don’t work from home, nor do I get paid for it, so…

    • moistclump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      But I also understand that not everyone is in a position to be able to turn this off and I would like the right to disconnect to be codified for them. Did I use codify correctly?

      • PetulantBandicoot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I agree, it should stay in place (as in, not repealed by subsequent government). Employees shouldn’t feel pressured to pick up the phone outside of work.

        I always thought not answering the phone was always an unwritten rule of employment unless it’s in your contact, so that’s the way I have always acted.

        Codify: “to arrange something, such as laws or rules, into a system”, so I believe that’s correct.