‘The health of our planet hangs in the balance while those entrusted with legislative power prioritise short-term political gain over the well-being of future generations.’
[…] Disruption is a tool.
But now, disruption is a crime. We’re not climate activists; we’re criminals.
(Article is soft-paywalled, archived link if you need it)
Disrupting other people lives and businesses is not a peaceful protest on my book. Fines should be proportional damage they caused and $20K is top you can get, exact sum is up to court.
You don’t just get to redefine what peaceful means. Disrupting people without using violence is peaceful.
@TheHolm
@Duenan
@Rory29
@danwritesbooks
https://mastodon.au/@Fury
@geekgirl
@unionagainstdhmo
@Zagorath
@MeanElevator
https://mastodon.au/@Heliograph
@eureka
@Philipnschofield
@caterinevauban
@Ilandar
@kudra
@Gorgritch_umie_killa
@milennialzero
@msdropbear42
@mediocratese
@timritchie
You hit the nail on the head. The anti-protest law was passed to protect business, at the expense of human rights https://www.hrlc.org.au/news/new-western-australian-bill-threatens-protest-rights
If it’s peaceful it’s peaceful. When I check the dictionary under “peaceful” it doesn’t say anything about business.
What else is a protest but a way to cause a disruption until politicians care enough to fix the issue you’re protesting for? If you’re not causing some kind of disruption it’s not really a protest cause people can just ignore you and nothing is gonna get done from it.