• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They could always use AI to create more content and then train on that!

    It isn’t like that causes issues in nature or anything.

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I know not with what GPT-5 will will reply with, but GPT-6 will reply with ‘Unfortunately as an language model I Unfortunately as an language model I I I Unfortunately Unfortunately Unfortunately model model model’” Albert GPTstein.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the thing that kills me about the “AI LLM’s will just keep getting better at ______” people. Potentially it can if you feed it nothing but new high quality data. But you need humans to generate that data and allow access to it. We are heading towards a point where people aren’t going to do that because they want to be compensated and AI LLM’s by and large don’t want to pay. Because they don’t want to divide the pot so to speak. They’re in it to make money, not pay people. That’s what this has always been about. It’s why so many of the larger ones are so worried about making themselves profitable with a paid tier and so on. And the more data that is scraped that’s not quality data the worse they become meaning the other companies who can afford to use them as a service and make them profitable won’t.