How fucking dare they. Talk about a movie that doesn’t need a sequel. Bill Paxton’s ghost does not deserve to be taunted like this.

  • farfarawaay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Y’all talking up Bill Paxton’s ghost but, like, what about Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s ghost?! Dusty doesn’t deserve it!

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I too, am irrationally annoyed at the idea of a Twister remake. My wife didn’t seem nearly as annoyed.

  • Ivy Raven@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The second I saw the drill going down I locally said, ‘why the fuck are you making a Twister remake’. Even pulling out the little wind ball things again. Putting an S on the name like it’s a sequel instead of the remake it appears to be.

      • Ivy Raven@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        A lot of the shots in the trailer looked like shots from the original. And the mapping balls, with the same distribution method, felt the most ‘same’. Maybe that’s from a flashback, but it is still an unnecessary movie. Why make a new movie/story when you can do a lazy sequel that you hope cashes in on nostalgia.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Here’s the thing: the real star of Twister is the storm chasing techniques and technologies.

    And it has been decades.

    The updated techniques and technologies deserve a cool movie too, and if they has called it anything else, I would be shouting angrily for the missed chance to call it “Twisters”.

    Also, anything that encourages more people to watch “Twister” is a good thing. So I’m really hoping this new one isn’t awful.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree with you, but then I got about halfway through watching the trailer and realized they’re reusing the exact same (and completely extraneous) rivalry plot.

    • Are modern techniques and technologies still requiring people to drive directly into storms? I feel like safety is one of the things vastly improved in all that time, which might not make for a very action-packed movie.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I have no idea. That’s part of what makes me curious about the film. I only have the IMDB page to go off of, but it sounded like they’re going for realism in technique and technology.

  • smort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Eh, it looks like it could be 90 minutes of fun. Hard to judge based on a trailer

  • Pepsi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    How fucking dare they.

    Wow you are really taking this as a personal affront, huh? you know, you can just not see the movie lol

    i can’t imagine getting worked up over the mere existence a throwaway summer action movie. i strongly recommend taking a social media sabbatical my dude.