The Nazis were far more discrete in their genocide than the Israelis. The amount of evidence for atrocities during the Holocaust is immensely lower. This is why Holocaust denialists exist and trolls who keep disputing the 6 million. Because it relies on families reporting one of their loved ones as killed without checks.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else. When you read a testimony about Sudan do you go “Is there any evidence those RSF soldiers really did that?”
Your comparison would make more sense if I was asking for proof of people being killed in Palestine at all instead of for this specific killing. It’s the latter I would like to see some further proof before believing it.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else
Of asking for proof before I trust something happened? I apply that to pretty much anything of consequence lol. Palestine is not exempt from it or special in it.
Ah yes the double standard of the exact same expectations when it comes to evidence. The same standard I hold most things of significance to. That old double standard lol
No there was proof then too, just much less than after. I wouldn’t have believed it was a thing based on a single claim without anything further either (which is not the same as denial). But same goes for all genocides, real or made up. That’s just the nature of waiting for proof for claims.
But in this case a better comparison would be a single murder during the holocaust, since we know widespread killing is happening
Then it’s a no for me dawg
Alright good luck denying the Holocaust as well.
Holocaust has some very well documented proof my dude
The Nazis were far more discrete in their genocide than the Israelis. The amount of evidence for atrocities during the Holocaust is immensely lower. This is why Holocaust denialists exist and trolls who keep disputing the 6 million. Because it relies on families reporting one of their loved ones as killed without checks.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else. When you read a testimony about Sudan do you go “Is there any evidence those RSF soldiers really did that?”
Here is a great video comparing evidence for the Gaza genocide to the Holocaust https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyY9zQJYZ4&t=76s
Your comparison would make more sense if I was asking for proof of people being killed in Palestine at all instead of for this specific killing. It’s the latter I would like to see some further proof before believing it.
Of asking for proof before I trust something happened? I apply that to pretty much anything of consequence lol. Palestine is not exempt from it or special in it.
Click the video and find out that you apply immense double standards.
Ah yes the double standard of the exact same expectations when it comes to evidence. The same standard I hold most things of significance to. That old double standard lol
It’s like you didn’t even read my reply
So either you did not watch the video or you deny the Holocaust. It’s probably the second.
Nowhere does it address what I’ve been talking about. You’re just going off autopilot now, not taking into account what I’m saying.
Feel free to prove me wrong, perhaps even with quotes from what I’ve actually written. Unless that’s too much to ask lol
Not while it was happening
No there was proof then too, just much less than after. I wouldn’t have believed it was a thing based on a single claim without anything further either (which is not the same as denial). But same goes for all genocides, real or made up. That’s just the nature of waiting for proof for claims.
But in this case a better comparison would be a single murder during the holocaust, since we know widespread killing is happening
What? Why would they?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyY9zQJYZ4&t=76s