• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Money… also known as… capital?

      You’re saying that it’s not capitalism at fault, it’s people who are bad at capitalism who are at fault.

      If you house those people, they’re no longer homeless. Problem solved. Other problems (like lack of consequences for bad life decisions) will still exist, but not homelessness.

      In my experience, drug and alcohol abuse is compounded by capitalism and by homelessness. The biggest contributor to homelessness though is neural atypicalness - people who don’t think in ways that directly benefit the society they live in. Often this expresses itself through coping systems that lead to addiction.

      The other thing of course is that if society doesn’t like someone, they’ll likely end up unhoused in that society.

      • mke_geek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        But then you’re saying people don’t have any personal responsibility for their actions.

        • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, they’re saying that we should, as the wealthiest society in history, look out for desperate people.

          Does WIC mean people don’t have personal responsibility? Does Medicaid? Does any other social program we’ve implemented?

          Raising the floor means the society is healthier for everyone.

          • mke_geek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m not talking about people who need a temporary leg up. I’m talking about able bodied people who just don’t feel like contributing to society. Everyone should just give them free money so they can sit home and play video games all day? (For example)

            • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Who said anything about giving people free money so that they can sit home and play video games all day?

              Why are you acting like that’s in any way comparable to sheltering unhoused people?

              Let’s focus on one thing at a time; I’m not going to chase down every irrelevant diversion you throw out.

              • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                Because more and more, people (at least in America) are feeling entitled to get free stuff without contributing to society.

                It’s been such a turnaround in attitude. Back in the WWII era, people went all out to support their community and the country. People would help their neighbors when needed. People wouldn’t want to go on welfare unless they had to. Then they worked hard to get off it.

                Nowadays it seems that people encourage each other to get government money and don’t want to do anything for themselves. They’ll have children they don’t care about just to get more money from the government. It’s ridiculous.

                • jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Wow, Capitalism is breeding Capitalists with Capitalist ideas? (get government money and don’t want to do anything for themselves) But it’s not Capitalism’s fault you say…

    • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Can you name a county where the federal minimum wage can pay for a 1 bedroom apartment?

      How about state minimum wage?

      Did you know that in some cases it is literally cheaper to just give homeless people houses?

      Why do Americans consider houses to be their primary asset which must appreciate in value?

      What do these questions have in common? Capitalism (particularly of the American variety)

      Some light reading for the curious: USA overview

      Helsinki Homelessness Solution (the Guardian)

      California info (refer to the sources in the footnotes)

      Fuck, take the Wikipedia page of you want

      • mke_geek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        $7.25 x 2080 (number of working hours in a year) / 12 = $1,256 A 1 bedroom can be rented for as little as $500-$600 in my city, even less if you have roommates. (Example: $800 for a 2 bedroom means it’s only $400/person and each person gets their own bedroom) Maybe the minimum wage should be increased since it hasn’t since 2009? You keep talking about just giving people a house. Have you given your house to a homeless person? Let them have it for free? Then you could walk away and buy another house to give away to another homeless person.

    • jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I had shitheads like you telling me why I was homeless, I would also be a heroin addict since it’s not like I had anything else to do anyway.