Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      NGL If I were rich Id probably buy one of his paintings just to hang it in the least used guest barhroom.

      Id never mention that it was a “Hitler” or why I had it. Id just like to have his failure be something my least favorite relatives have to stare at while they take a shit. My own personal fuck you to the cunt.

      • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s really inviting layers of ugliness into your life and your mind, and subjecting your guests to stealth ugliness.

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nope, its hilarious.

          Reducing anything that anyone who venerates Hitler or Nazis to a joke is better than destroying it. Because its just a shitty painting, its not evil, it doesnt hold psychic power, its not a banner to rally behind. Its just a terrible mans terrible painting that is now something that hangs above Uncle Joe while he clogs the toilet with his mammoth fast food dumps.

          • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s poison, and you’d be subjecting yourself and your guests to poison.

            It’s not funny, and Burt K is a drooling moron. He’s pretty much brain dead.