• tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some amount of centralisation in domain management is necessary, in order to agree who owns what.

      Devolving control of TLDs to respective nations was actually a GOOD idea because it means each country can operate those TLDs in a way that fits their needs, which is already much better than all global TLDs being operated by a single organisation.

      The main mistake is that queer .af chose to register a domain controlled by a government who was very likely to have problems with what they were using it for.

      Nowadays there are a large number of ‘new’ TLDs which are not nationally controlled and may be a better choice.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The national top-level domains are MEANT to be controlled by their relevant nation-states. They are not intended to be part of vanity URLs.

      So there’s nothing to “fix” here. This is the system working as intended, basically.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is the internet equivalent of choosing to open a gay bar in Kabul instead of San Francisco.

      There were plenty of safe spaces, they chose terribly.