• neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t remember where I was going with the above, to be honest. Probably expressing my distain for DNS as an operational requirement instead of a convenient option.

      I haven’t dug deeply myself either, but I don’t see why instances can’t connect together dynamically, independent from address or hostname, instead using key exchange to authenticate. FQDN being such an integral part of the functionality is a huge liability

        • neidu2@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s an example of an optional convenience, with which I have no problem.

          Would any sensible person use DNS for accessing your site? Yes
          When the amish take control of the .vip TLD in an effort to ban automotive transport, will you have to build the site up from scratch just because you give it a new domain? No.

          I don’t remember the details, but there was a post ago made by an instance admin who could no longer use the domain name he has built his lemmy instance around, and (according to the comments, at least) that basically meant that he had to scrap everything and start over.