ColdWater@lemmy.ca to Unixporn@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agoLinux is colorfullemmy.caexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkLinux is colorfullemmy.caColdWater@lemmy.ca to Unixporn@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago Linux systems usually consume more energy than identical systems with other operating systems Is this true?
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-23 months agoYes, at least on battery powered PCs. Other kinds of machines may be more efficient on Linux but I guess these are mostly cases when there are no big and well developed proprietary solutions for them.
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoI imagine it varies wildly by distro, hardware, use-case, etc.
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoI don’t have any information that proves it. I think in this list only hardware matters.
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoSurely use-case is important? Someone running a server that’s on 24/7 vs. someone running it on a laptop or desktop that they shut down every day.
Is this true?
Yes, at least on battery powered PCs. Other kinds of machines may be more efficient on Linux but I guess these are mostly cases when there are no big and well developed proprietary solutions for them.
I imagine it varies wildly by distro, hardware, use-case, etc.
I don’t have any information that proves it. I think in this list only hardware matters.
Surely use-case is important? Someone running a server that’s on 24/7 vs. someone running it on a laptop or desktop that they shut down every day.