• NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    People hate on patreon for getting rid of per-creation billing but did your audience even want it anyway? Having to budget for those occasional months that have 5 paydays in them and thus cost the user 25% more is annoying and I bet they got the feedback that per-month is vastly preferred by their paying customers.

    • corvi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not even per-creation, but the weird system of always paying at the start of the month, instead of just subscribing whenever. It’s stopped me from subbing multiple times because I don’t want to pay double for one week of access.

      The singular argument for that system is that it enables creators to pause payments for a month without it fucking up billing for people. I mostly sub to authors, and if they take a month off, the ones not doing the first of the month model have a lot of issues.

    • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like it because the person I follow only posts like once a year, and they like it because they don’t feel burdened to post more.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      An edge case, but one of the artists I follow is in Ukraine and has not been the most active. I prefer by creation billing because I want to make sure the money goes to her and doesn’t just pile up in patreons coffers.