• SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can read their motivation in the linked pull request. FWIW I don’t think there’s any ill intent here and certainly not an attempt to boost their own instance. I think they just want Lemmy to be decentralized and lemmy.world being as big as it is kinda prevents that.

    I’m not sure I would’ve done it that way personally but I can see the reasoning and it’s not entirely unreasonable.

    • 101@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my humble opinion, join lemmy should only exclude the instances that is harmful.

      They should not choose the instances to include for the users.

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lemmy.world becoming the default Lemmy instance, and it growing to outsize all other instances is a danger: it makes the Fediverse centralized, easy to take down and easy to take over.

        • 101@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The same applies to the mastodon . Social instance and the same applies really to every Fediverse software available, with the exception of pixelfed.

            • 101@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Pixelfed has a default limit to the number of users per instance.

                • 101@feddit.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I believe yes, but at the last time I checked it out no instance had open registration, matter of fact you will have to look for good time for a free instance to register on.

                  Maybe they changed it now, but 1 year ago that was the case.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think I generally agree with you, but I don’t think this is a big grievance. Lemmy.world has enough traction as it is, they don’t really need the “publicity” from join-lemmy.org.

        It would’ve been better if they had written this as some kind of policy beforehand. Like if they had written somewhere before this pull request something like “any instance with more than 40% of active users may be excluded from the join-lemmy.org listing”, then it would’ve been more reasonable too.

        • Ruud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          It would have been better if they communicated to us first. I don’t disagree that user signups should be spread over instances. We now have a link to https://lemmyverse.net on our signup page so people can check if another instance would fit them better.

          • nutomic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I posted about this in the admin chat on matrix, but you’re right the pull request was merged very quickly.

            The lemmyverse link is also a good idea, but users only see it after filling in their email and password. At that point it’s unlikely that they would cancel it and go to a different website.

            Edit: I’m now thinking to change the joinlemmy code so that any instance with more than x% of active users will automatically be hidden.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        In my humble opinion, join lemmy should only exclude the instances that is harmful.

        They’d then have to hide their own instances…