The demand that the treasurer intervene to cut rates unless governor Michele Bullock does so herself effectively sinks Jim Chalmers's chances of passing his reforms.

This seems pretty wtf.

What sort of precedent do they want to set? Whether or not you embrace neoliberal ideology political interference with monetary policy has not typically gone well, no matter what or whom you want to blame for that.

Am I missing something, or are they just going off the rails here?

  • Minarble@aussie.zone
    0·
    1 month ago

    That’s right I think, which goes to show the Greens want to do something that even Paul Keating baulked at. A very bad precedent to start.