Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The question (which doesn’t matter) now is, does he really understand crypto? Or did he get at the right conclusion because he thinks that everybody else, like him, is just scamming all the time?

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Given the kinds of crowds he hangs out with (i.e. mostly other rich people and political elite) is that not an understandable conclusion?

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      anything that makes yglesias have a bad day is generally a good thing

      but it sounds like the orange man understands the crypto market perfectly: the numbers are all made up and everyone’s lying

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean there are definitely some brain rotted crypto bros who would buy shares at face value because it’s totally gonna go to the moon guys

  • Mii@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am sure this is totally not sketchy in the slightest and the people behind it have no nefarious agenda whatsoever.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah yes the advertisement which causes T&S people (who have seen some things) to go on long rants on why you should never put pictures of your kids online publically.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      fuck that’s gross

      where’d you find/run across that? can’t tell if it’s a normal ad or some gig-site thing or what

      • Mii@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Saw it posted on Reddit. It’s apparently from clickworker.com which is a weird-ass website by itself at first glance, with great pitches like this:

        People are happier if they are more financially independent. We can help you achieve this.

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Somehow I managed to mention the wordpress lawsuit on last week’s thread instead of this one, so let’s try again.

    Matt Mullenweg, the wordpress(.)com guy and current owner of tumblr, tried to shakedown competing blog product WP engine (which builds on the same open source software that his company does) for 8% of their revenue (https://goblin.band/notes/9yjrc2logimd1tr3 h/t to froztbyte who was also on the old thread for some mysterious reason) or he’d say mean things about them at a conference where they were one of the sponsors. And they didn’t pay up, so he compared them to cancer.

    And now they’re suing him.

    https://notes.ghed.in/posts/2024/matt-mullenweg-wp-engine-debacle/

  • sc_griffith@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    just heard a podcast ad for amazon prime saying it causes “involuntary deal squeals” followed by a categorization of different kinds of customer grunts and squeals according to product. not making this up

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I swear I keep seeing Amazon ads in this same icky dehumanizing “cute” style, like some of the annoyance-based ads I vaguely remember from when I still had cable TV. is this just what ads become every time a corporation decides you have no other choice? (yes, almost every time)

      • mountainriver@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “…37%… That means nearly one in four…”

        Eh, no it doesn’t, it means nearly two in five. Which is worse.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So you’re saying that they’ve got books worth at least a grand which their owners are literally using to flaunt their wealth?

      I’m legally obligated to say stealing is legally and morally wrong buuuuuuuut

      • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        @BlueMonday1984 Betcha the authors aren’t getting paid industry-normal royalties (10-15% of net receipts) on those Veblen goods …

        (A few of my novels have been sold as limited-run signed first editions. Typically for 50%-100% more than the normal hardcover price, so maybe 3-5% as much as this nonsense. Cost of goods for a leatherbound, gilt-trimmed luxury edition is maybe $5-10, plus 10% of the cover price for the author. So someone in the middle is making serious bank.)

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            If there is an elevator in the apartment, the driver has to take the stairs, contractually. Of course people who order that don’t live in high rise apartments where the driver can reach the door, so everybody wins.

      • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        @froztbyte Your term of art in economics to describe this shitbaggery is “Veblen goods”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_good

        “a type of luxury good… for which the demand increases as the price increases, in apparent contradiction of the law of demand, resulting in an upward-sloping demand curve. The higher prices of Veblen goods may make them desirable as a status symbol in the practices of conspicuous consumption and conspicuous leisure.”

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I vaguely remember mentioning this AI doomer before, but I ended up seeing him openly stating his support for SB 1047 whilst quote-tweeting a guy talking about OpenAI’s current shitshow:

    pro-1047 doomer

    I’ve had this take multiple times before, but now I feel pretty convinced the “AI doom/AI safety” criti-hype is going to end up being a major double-edged sword for the AI industry.

    The industry’s publicly and repeatedly hyped up this idea that they’re developing something so advanced/so intelligent that it could potentially cause humanity to get turned into paperclips if something went wrong. Whilst they’ve succeeded in getting a lot of people to buy this idea, they’re now facing the problem that people don’t trust them to use their supposedly world-ending tech responsibly.

    • imadabouzu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Isn’t the primary reason why people are so powerful persuaded by this technology, because they’re constantly sworn to that if they don’t use its answers they will have their life’s work and dignity removed from them? Like how many are in the control group where they persuade people with a gun to their head?

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      it’s easy to imagine a world where the people working on AI that are also convinced about AI safety decide to shun OpenAI for actions like this. It’s also easy to imagine that OpenAI finds some way to convince their feeble, gullible minds to stay and in fact work twice as hard. My pitch: just tell them GPT X is showing signs of basilisk nature and it’s too late to leave the data mines

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I hate how it is called mining, like it is digging up some resource from the earth. While it is just an advanced calculator.

      Imagine they found a hidden iron ore mine (That is what I recall being mined in Sweden, if anybody knows something more interesting, like some precious stones, please inform me (looking at this gold/silver could also work)) under a hospital. But nope, just a hidden datacenter.

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    People are “blatantly stealing my work,” AI artist complains

    When Jason Allen submitted his bombastically named Théâtre D’opéra Spatial to the US Copyright Office, they weren’t so easily fooled as the judges back in Colorado. It was decided that the image could not be copyrighted in its entirety because, as an AI-generated image, it lacked the essential element of “human authorship". The office decided that, at best, Allen could copyright specific parts of the piece that he worked on himself in Photoshop.

    “The Copyright Office’s refusal to register Theatre D’Opera Spatial has put me in a terrible position, with no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing my work without compensation or credit.” If something about that argument rings strangely familiar, it might be due to the various groups of artists suing the developers of AI image generators for using their work as training data without permission.

    via @[email protected]

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    a twitter thread by sv ceo where comment section wants to do some recreational union busting, political assassinations and automating away longshoremen (lmao) over checks notes black friday bringing slightly less profit to mass retailers. to which i say, fuck your black friday then

    and he says that it’ll affect elections? specifically in “don’t do anything visible in interest of unions or trump will win” kinda way? what kinda madhouse is this americans explain https://xcancel.com/typesfast/status/1836498432510562788#m

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      fuck your black friday then

      the institutionalisation of it is/was also just fucking nuts

      and then in recent years it’s slowly been creeping out into other countries too, with other vendors in other places aping “black friday deals”

      I have no mouth and I must scream

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Guy invented a new way to misinterpret the matrix, nice. Was getting tired of all the pilltalk

    • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      yes. that’s all true, but academics and artists and leftists are actually calling for Buttlerian jihad all the time. when push comes to shove they will ally with fascists on AI

      This guy severely underestimates my capacity for being against multiple things at the same time.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The type of guy who was totally convinced by the ‘but what if the AI needs to generate slurs to stop the nukes?’ argument.