• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Here’s the reason AAA devs are obsessed with graphics:

      It’s the only thing that differentiates them from indie devs.

      Once you realize that indie devs can do anything and everything that a AAA game can do, except for creating tons of high detail 3D models, levels, and textures, you begin to see the AAA studio’s dilemma. If they don’t hire all those artists, level designers, and animators then they’re forced to compete with indie devs on gameplay, story, and features — none of which they can do!

      Why is that? Because there are millions of indie game devs out there who are willing to spend many years of their lives trying out ideas that have close to zero chance of being successful and all the gamers out there are happy to pick that one in a million game which actually succeeds! For a AAA studio to step into that arena would be absolutely foolish.

      It’s the same reason big corporations dominate book publishing but they don’t even bother trying to write books themselves.

    • MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I will never understand the obsession around computer-crashingly good graphics. They push your temps to the max and computer components don’t start throttling themselves until the temps are a little too high so that your shit will stop working sooner so you have to buy a new gpu sooner. Why can’t they let us control the thermal throttling temp, huh? Fuck that 99 degree celsius shit. “99c is acceptable temps for laptops and gpus” my ass.

      Pixel art isn’t a necessarily a positive selling point to me but if the game is good and the graphics are good enough to be able to tell what’s going on without having to get high on drugs first, then its fine by me. Ps2 or xbox 360 era 3d graphics are the sweet spot though. I’m glad they finally added actual graphics to Dwarf Fortress, it’s actually playable now. If the msdos installation process has better graphics then a game then that’s pushing things little too far imho.

      • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        yep. Elden Ring is an example… cant even play that game without my fans going nuts. I didnt even buy the DLC expansion yet… taking a break until I get a better PC. Being a patient gamer means always having cool games to look forward to, someday far in the future lol

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It looks so marketing driven.

        We are in decades of video games. Look at very old game and assess how “ugly” they are by today’s standard while at their time they were “the best graphics ever seen in history!” or something.

        And so, the big question: we were having fun with games decades ago already. If graphics were part of the fun, your brain should explode under the immensely higher level of fun you have on modern games vs 20y old games. And… well…nope. Same as before, just higher expectations.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          very well said. I think the last time i got excited about graphics was when Final Fantasy X came out lol. then they kept getting more realistic but never actually became real, they stayed video games. even VR. so… maybe graphics aren’t what we need to keep working on

          EDIT: *aren’t, not are, FUCK. I’m saying no matter how much graphics improve, it’s still just a video game, good or bad

          • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Games going for that uncanny valley aesthetic and not being nearly as efficient. I don’t want a 1000W PSU just to run my graphics card.

        • lazyViking@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          Are you perhaps retarded? Do you not understand that expectations change with current technology? Daily life must be immensely difficult for you

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course, I don’t want my game to look like utter dogshit, and graphics can be apart of the fun, but my biggest concerns with games are how they play and what the story/characters is like (if it’s that type of game).

        There can be times that I can appreciate more realistic looking games, but honestly it’s boring to see so many games try the same style over and over again, especially when it isn’t executed well. And if worrying about graphics causes my game to be an unoptimized game with a lackluster story, then I’d rather people just stick with a less detailed style to preserve the the fun (imo) part of games, which is literally everything else.

    • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously, way too many games are just generic garbage that advertise only on “look how realistic my game is, you’re not a true gamer if the games you play don’t make your computer sound like a jet engine!”