Hey y’all, today I experienced another push for Linux from our friend Microsoft. 5 minutes ago, I wanted to use the timer app on Windows, so I could manage my work/break schedule, and this fucker showed up. Yes, that’s a prompt to sign in with a Microsoft account to use the clock. If you close it, it pops up 30s later. Clicking “Don’t sign in” or closing the process responsible for displaying it is useless, and guess what… IT PAUSES THE TIMER WHEN IT SHOWS UP.

I guess this is another thing added to the super long list of things which will eventually make me switch my main workstation to Linux once win10 is discontinued.

/endrant

Hope y’all are having a great day :3

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        better to start figuring out your workflow on linux now than waiting for shit to hit the fan and do it in a hurry.

      • gerdesj@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        What are they?

        I ditched Windows roughly 15 years ago and I run a MS Silver partner shop.

        I daily drive Kubuntu (was Arch but I need to tick boxes). I used to teach DTP, WP, spreadsheets etc and Libre Office is fine as a replacement for MSO. Email - Exchange and Evolution EWS. I create the most complicated docs in my firm and MSO works with them OK.

        I 3D print stuff and use LibreCAD and OpenSCAD. All good. Also note that there are lots of other CAD apps on Linux for free/libre and of course we have

        As far as I am aware, games is the only area that Linux might fail and that issue is shrinking rapidly.

        • kureta@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          8 years or so for me. I miss Ableton and Sibelius. I have Bitwig and Musescore but I still miss them. Musescore is getting better and better (I am planning on moving to lilypond anyway) but Bitwig is too alien for me. It is almost the same bu not really. If it was completely different, it might have been easier to get used to. Also I wish there was a viable open source alternative to Bitwig.

      • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        was in the same situation for a while, but I switched a few weeks ago and I’ve never since looked back

    • object [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d imagine it’s to force me to sign in to use the timer. Shittify the version that can’t track as much, and force the users to use it logged in

      • loutr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Does the timer “jump” to the correct time after you dismiss the window ? It’s also possible that they didn’t bother testing the app when logged out, and that the popup blocks the UI thread while it’s displayed. In short it could be bad coding and QA instead of intentional enshittification.

        • object [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          No it pauses the timer. Once I dismiss the popup I can see that the pause button icon has been replaced with the continue/play icon. Clicking it unpauses the timer until the popup pops up again.

            • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I can imagine the project lead in the meeting: “Okay guys, we need to make the worst timer app ever, so I can sell my better timer app in the app store. Any ideas?” “You can start the timer, but need to be online and sign in with 2FA to keep the timer running.” “Brad, you’re a genius.”

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        People can just use a different timer, use a batch script or task scheduler. I once even made a multiplatform timer for my tea myself in Java that can go to the systray.

        My point is: By making it annoying, they just drive them away to the many alternatives and gain nothing. It seems like some mistake idk.

    • object [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Microsoft had made a product that has for decades been used to run other people’s software. They’ve unintentionally made windows a “monopoly” in the sense that no other os can run windows only software perfectly. Most consumers will probably think Linux " is just a terminal and too advanced", and the others who can install a distro might still be locked into using windows because not all software can run under wine.

      So to you they might seem overconfident in that you can switch, but for some they’re shit out of luck in the department of alternatives. Microsoft knows they can exploit their users, and they will do it

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not the OP but he may mean that application authors have unintentionally made Windows a monopoly.

          Either way, I am not sure I agree about the intentionality. App devs didn’t slip and support only Windows by accident. They may not have explicitly intended all the consequences of Windows monopoly but one dominant platform is an advantage for the app vendors too. Too many targets to support is part of what keeps commercial software off Linux.

          The only ones hurt by a Windows monopoly are the consumers. Well, and commercial Windows alternatives obviously. But all the app makers are fine with it.

          Valve ( makers of Steam ) can be seen as an alternative platform for gaming. This is why you see Valve investing so heavily in Linux even though they make all their money on Windows.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Then explain Chrome OS. Seriously though a lot of software is web based these days. Windows is not special for most uses.

  • OzoneGameDev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is supposed to be the most used operating system, recommended for its ease of use. Meanwhile you have to sign in to use a clock app. Such a shame, especially because the focus timers are actually useful.

  • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    why wait the death of win10 when you can switch now, get that painful first days learning things out of the way now that you have a fallback if absolutely necessary

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I cannot speak for the OP but most of the pepper claiming they are waiting will not switch. They may use an illegally patched or trimmed version of Windows 11. Many won’t even do that.

      The biggest risk for Microsoft is that everybody stays on Windows 10 without updates. Or that massive customers will force them to push back the “enterprise” date over and over. To encourage migration, expect Microsoft to make Windows 10 just as bad as 11 before support expires.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Windows is a platform for Office. Linux is not a supported platform for Office. Most businesses will not migrate their desktops off Windows because they will not migrate their workforce off Office.

    Beyond that, Windows is not as important to Microsoft as it used to be. The real money makers are Azure and Office. With Azure, they do not care if you run Linux. They even have their own distro ( Azure Linux — previously CBL Mariner ).

    Azure is the future ( even for Office ).

    Since Windows is less strategic, Microsoft is looking to milk it as a cash cow while they can. So, Product Management is tasked with finding new ways to monetize it. Data is worth a lot of money. The best way to farm data from users these days is to frame it as security ( or AI ).

    Expect a lot more SIngle Sign On. Expect a lot more AI. Expect a lot more cloud integration. Expect all of these to focus on data harvesting.

    A bit later, expect “services” for Linux that attempt the same. Like Google on Android. This is harder though as Windows does not have monopoly control over Linux as a platform. I am sure they are having many meetings about how to change that.

      • Majestic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which is so weird, because office is crapware. It’s terrible software.

        If so then all the other offerings are even worse crapware.

        In my experience Microsoft Office opens twice as fast reliably than LibreOffice (when I terminate the process responsible for keeping it ready it takes about the same amount of time but it’s no slower importantly).

        Microsoft office is simply the best. It’s a fact. It can do tons of things that Libreoffice and OpenOffice cannot. It has tons of advanced features, it’s just a superior office suite.

        Comparing LibreOffice to Microsoft Office is like comparing a Lexus SUV with the full package of options installed compared to a basic fleet Ford sedan. Yes both can do very basic things and if you just need to type some things or do very basic spreadsheets then they’re interchangeable.

        But ask some slightly advanced things like sortable tables (Excel does easily) and suddenly only MS office can do that and the LibreOffice people tell you to pound sand and use a database which doesn’t make sense for a lot of tasks when you may just be preparing some data for example for a presentation or some quick financial work (I’m talking about stuff for myself, not a professional accountant), etc. Take a look at design options in MS Word compared to LibreOffice writer. Both have title and header styling options but the MS office ones simply look more professional, cleaner, and they have more options you can easily tweak. If I’m presenting a report I absolutely want to do it in MS office because I can make it look neater and nicer with less effort.

        Businesses use it because 1) they’re used to using it, it’s a standard among businesses and the public, and it’s maximally compatible with files created by it so interoperability isn’t an issue as long as you too use it, 2) it’s the best. It has more options than others, it can do more things. It has more depth. It has extensive support and documentation and it has good integration between the different pieces of software.

        It’s like comparing GIMP to Photoshop. Sorry. I think FOSS is a great philosophy and I hate Microsoft and Adobe as much as anyone but in practice Photoshop is miles and miles beyond GIMP in capabilities. And this is coming from someone who has GIMP installed and not Photoshop (because PS is expensive).

        The extended suite of MS office has always been meh. But it doesn’t matter. Word, Excel, PowerPoint all work great and are exceptional tools at the top of their class. Could they be better? Yes. But they don’t have to be the best possible, they just have to be the best compared to other offerings by a country mile and they are if your needs are any more complex than the occasional letter to grandma.

        Does that mean I think people should pay for MS Office? Not when there are ways to get it free with no cracking or risk.

      • Zeusz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Could you elaborate on why is it crapware? What should people and buisnesses use instead in your oppinion?

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    You cannot use anything without signing up. You can’t use clip champ which should require 0 Internet connectivity.

    They want to act as if linking your account is a prerequisite when it’s neither required or helpful

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because it’s a “free” piece of software so you are the product and therefore they want you to agree that they can harvest and sell your data

      • _____@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Except it’s not a free operating system. An operating system should fulfill the needs of its users without having to pay for basic functionality: see everyone OS ever that is not w11

  • OADINC@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate this pop up, I had to re-signin every day into outlook with my private Microsoft email address. EVERYDAY, THEY ARE BOTH MICROSOFT PRODUCTS. HOW CAN YOU FUCK THIS UP SO BADDD?