• bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But sugar dissolves in cold water. It just takes a bit longer. This is 9th grade chemistry. At 20°C 203.9g sugar are soluble per 100ml of water.

    [Edit: Sorry, for the Americans here: At 68°F, 1 cup of sugar is soluble in 21/50 cups of water.]

    Wikipedia (de): Zucker cites Hans-Albert Kurzhals: Lexikon Lebensmitteltechnik. Volume 2: L – Z. Behr, Hamburg 2003, ISBN 3-86022-973-7, p. 723.

  • Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a server, southerners stare at me in wide eyed awe when I pour a disgusting amount of simple syrup into a glass of iced tea.

      • Cmot_Dibbler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s just a high concentration of sugar dissolved in water. Not used in food really unless you need to sweeten some cold tea for some southerners, i guess. Very commonly used to make alcoholic mixed drinks though.

  • MildPudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i hate when i go down south and go to restaurants and order iced tea and get a glass of concentrated sugar water

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sugar should be heavily taxed, it’s so dangerous at rates of more than 10 grams a day

      • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It should be taxed on the corporate side. Taxing sugar on the consumer side becomes a poor tax, because poor people will still want sweets from time to time, making those treats now more and more expensive. Well off people will just accept the tax because it’s marginal to them, but when your chocolate bar that you treat yourself to once a week goes from 1.29 to 3.29, then it really fucks your day up.

        What should be done is incentives to provide less sugar/glucose-fructose on the product side and encourage companies to make snacks and beverages that have less sugar content.

  • remotelove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, it’s the gays or atheists. Or “colored” people. Or whoever they are told to hate at that moment. This happens more than you know in this day and age:

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems like a US thing I’m too European to understand

    (aka. they bring us the ingredients, and we make our own tea at the restaurant table)

    • ViperActual@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s called sweet tea in the US is overwhelmingly sweet. That was my reaction to it the first time I tried it. It’s so sweet, the only way you can get that much sugar in it is if you dissolve that sugar in hot tea.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know if you need to be told this.

          Pay the money and buy real maple syrup, not ‘pancake syrup.’ Real maple syrup is one of the best tastes on the planet.

          • gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m aware of the existence and superiority of maple syrup. I only use Aunt Jemima in this example because that’s what oversweetened tea tastes like to me: shit.