• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Would you call the pyramids the most difficult engineering problems in human history? They had a whole lot worse tools. I wasn’t taking into account how much easier the tools make it, just the complexity of the challenge.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean. They were pretty challenging, I would expect.

        It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

          What do you mean? Starship does too.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It was about “Those are literally the engineers who worked on this, one of the most difficult engineering problems in human history, having nailed it on their first try.”

            And how the tools, materials, processes, and organizational structures to deal with those complexities do in fact make it easier than say the original Apollo missions.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Easier for the individual people, but not an easier engineering challenge. 150T to LEO reusability is a harder problem statement 150T to LEO single use.