Oh okay so you employ the same strategy as the article. Just provide enough text (with an LLM) in your response to discourage the reader from engaging meaningfully while amazingly saying nothing meaningfully related to our discussion.
The disinformation age sucks. I have no words for how much you suck. So unless your response to this message is a succinct, human-typed reply that makes a single related argument to the legitmacy of a candidates smell then good day to you, chatgpt.
Thats your own fault. My request was simple. You have not commented on the smell of a candidate contributing or detracting from their ability to hold office. You just said trumps fans may hate it, and trump indeed smells, and that trump has done bad things including telling people they smell.
Still waiting for your answer to the original question.
You have not commented on the smell of a candidate contributing or detracting from their ability to hold office.
Fair. I explained what the article was actually about, which wasn’t that. I personally think a candidate whose stench of feces and ketchup is legendary would not be a good representative to send out to other countries as leader of America. But that’s just me. A lowly LLM. Still I know you don’t give a good goddamn about that either, so in other news the things I like are awesome and the things you like suck. Infinity plus one.
Oh wow an actual reason provided. Too bad it doesnt mean shit compared presidents that were too unhealthy to fit in a bathtub or even walk. What other arbitrary limits should we set upon holding office, or for that matter to work in america? Why stop at discriminating smell? Is it maybe because you are deriving candidate viability based on trump instead of objective criteria for a candidate?
Oh okay so you employ the same strategy as the article. Just provide enough text (with an LLM) in your response to discourage the reader from engaging meaningfully while amazingly saying nothing meaningfully related to our discussion.
The disinformation age sucks. I have no words for how much you suck. So unless your response to this message is a succinct, human-typed reply that makes a single related argument to the legitmacy of a candidates smell then good day to you, chatgpt.
Goddamn son, do you have a comment on the facts or not? I spent twenty minutes replying to you and this is what you’ve got.
Christ.
Thats your own fault. My request was simple. You have not commented on the smell of a candidate contributing or detracting from their ability to hold office. You just said trumps fans may hate it, and trump indeed smells, and that trump has done bad things including telling people they smell.
Still waiting for your answer to the original question.
Edit: “facts” lmao
lmao rofl lol wtf rizz
Fair. I explained what the article was actually about, which wasn’t that. I personally think a candidate whose stench of feces and ketchup is legendary would not be a good representative to send out to other countries as leader of America. But that’s just me. A lowly LLM. Still I know you don’t give a good goddamn about that either, so in other news the things I like are awesome and the things you like suck. Infinity plus one.
Oh wow an actual reason provided. Too bad it doesnt mean shit compared presidents that were too unhealthy to fit in a bathtub or even walk. What other arbitrary limits should we set upon holding office, or for that matter to work in america? Why stop at discriminating smell? Is it maybe because you are deriving candidate viability based on trump instead of objective criteria for a candidate?
Lets pick on blind people next maybe?
Again, no, that’s not what it’s about.
Gosh you’re a strange person. Okay then. Bye.
What is “it”, and what is it about?
Sorry your bullshit rambling doesnt amount to an opinion. :(
Get well soon.