SagXD@lemm.ee to Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 17 小时前Hungry 9lemmy.likes.catimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1509arrow-down124
arrow-up1485arrow-down1imageHungry 9lemmy.likes.catSagXD@lemm.ee to Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 17 小时前message-square107fedilink
minus-squareskulbuny@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·10 小时前Unless you consider probabilities. That’s a very strange field—you can’t objectively verify it.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-27 小时前You can’t objectively verify anything in mathematics. It’s a formal system. Once you start talking about objective verification, you’re talking about science not math.
minus-squaretaladar@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 小时前It is actually the opposite, since it is purely abstract everything in math is objective. There is literally no subjectivity possible in something that isn’t in the real world.
Unless you consider probabilities. That’s a very strange field—you can’t objectively verify it.
You can’t objectively verify anything in mathematics. It’s a formal system.
Once you start talking about objective verification, you’re talking about science not math.
It is actually the opposite, since it is purely abstract everything in math is objective. There is literally no subjectivity possible in something that isn’t in the real world.