Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 23 days agoProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squarehumblebun@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·22 days agoOne point on the line Take 2 points on normal on the opposite sides Try to connect it Wow you can’t
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·22 days agoThis isn’t a rigorous mathematic proof that would prove that it holds true in every case. You aren’t wrong, but this is a colloquial definition of proof, not a mathematical proof.
minus-squarehumblebun@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·22 days agoSorry, I’ve spent too much of my earthly time on reading and writing formal proofs. I’m not gonna write it now, but I will insist that it’s easy
minus-squaredavidagain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-222 days agoOnly works for a smooth curve with a neighbourhood around it. I think you need the transverse regular theorem or something.
One point on the line
Take 2 points on normal on the opposite sides
Try to connect it
Wow you can’t
This isn’t a rigorous mathematic proof that would prove that it holds true in every case. You aren’t wrong, but this is a colloquial definition of proof, not a mathematical proof.
Sorry, I’ve spent too much of my earthly time on reading and writing formal proofs. I’m not gonna write it now, but I will insist that it’s easy
Only works for a smooth curve with a neighbourhood around it. I think you need the transverse regular theorem or something.