Privacy advocates got access to Locate X, a phone tracking tool which multiple U.S. agencies have bought access to, and showed me and other journalists exactly what it was capable of. Tracking a phone from one state to another to an abortion clinic. Multiple places of worship. A school. Following a likely juror to a residence. And all of this tracking is possible without a warrant, and instead just a few clicks of a mouse.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      I got nothing to hide.

      I’m willing to bet that they have curtains on their bedroom window…

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      Then how you gonna take a selfie in the bed?

      Seriously tho, people need phones for everything, including their calendar and map and communication with their partner.

      Not bringing a phone isn’t an option

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 minutes ago

        Mapquest is still around, so that solves one problem. The rest can be alleviated by communicating in person with your partner and aligning on a plan to not get tracked (like partner driving you and leaving their phone at home).

        In the absence of that help, friends or family you trust. A cab? The clinic probably has a phone to hail a cab when you’re there.

        Disclaimer: I’m just providing work arounds, I’m not saying they’re ideal.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 seconds ago

      burner goes from your house, to abortion clinic, to your office, back to your house

      Hmm, must be someone else, I don’t recognize this number

      -The Government

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      I didn’t read the article, but wouldn’t the site see the phone as soon as it’s taken out of the bag? Unless the plan is to leave the phone in the bag the whole time, at which point it seems easier to just leave it behind.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This should be illegal. There is absolutely no good reason this should be available to anybody. It should also be considered unconstitutional; if one of those dots is a person, whether you directly know who the person is or not, it should violate the right to privacy and the right of illegal search and seizure — no questions asked.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Search and seizure, the Fourth Amendment, only applies to State actors. The only exception is when a private entity is acting as an agent of the government, such as in the case of private prisons.

      Congress needs to pass consumer protection laws aimed at privacy in the digital age. They haven’t updated this sort of thing I believe since 1996. It used to be legal for adult video stores to disclose the tapes people rented, but Congress passed a privacy law forbidding it when some journalists disclosed some of their rentals. The scandal had some cool name. I forgot what.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You are right. And you’re fighting against the credit reporting agencies and google, facebook, apple, and all car manufacturers for privacy rights.

      This is the result of jurists and legislators who don’t understand a single goddamned thing about computers in 2024. For fuck’s sake it’s been thirty goddamned years since this was obviously going to happen. Take a class, you bastards! Those of you who aren’t Heritage Foundation fascists.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s not getting better either: https://futurism.com/the-byte/gen-z-kids-file-systems

        There seems to have been a short window of maybe two decades in the 80s and 90s when computers and the Internet were becoming household staples where almost everyone who grew up in that time period knows what’s up, while everyone who didn’t is way more ignorant. The older folks are lost because they didn’t grow up with computers. The younger kids are lost because they were born into a world of advanced UIs, “plug and play”, and software that heavily obfuscates the nitty gritty details of how it works.

        Being forced to run command line installers, edit config.sys files, set DIP switches correctly for your front side bus speed and messing with IRQ settings for your sound card and such just to play a computer game will definitely teach you a thing or two. My family’s PC came with not only an instruction manual, but an entire language reference for the built in GW-Basic interpreter. Nowadays, you get a laptop with a small pamphlet showing you how to plug it in and turn it on.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As people get ready to vote here in the US, one issue I haven’t even heard brought up is the lack of privacy regulations in the US. Do most people not care if the person they’re voting for is fine with every corporation selling and sharing personal data?

    • IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      improving the healthcare system is not even a topic of discussion this time around let alone something most people would see as abstract

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      Privacy regulations are to the left of the Overton window. The idea that corporations don’t have some divinely ordained ownership of our personal data is unthinkably radical.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      Omg there’s soo many critically important issues that never even get brought up.

      Like shutting down the nuclear arsenal, defunding the military and police, establishing a carbon tax, making carbon extraction illegal, establishing UBI. All of these basic policies never even get discussed on mainstream media and it drives me crazy.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Our electoral system results in a choice between two candidates, and both are fine with it.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I was just traveling in the UK and I had this discussion more than once having to explain why our options are always terrible and ignoring issues voters want addressed.

      • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And more over the electorate is calcified along party lines where the outcomes for either side is perceived as being stark and dire. I suspect this means concerns like these might get stifled even if it is held by both parties.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’d be surprised if it lasted longer than any other socially progressive trend. A few weeks, tops, with largest proportions falling off in the first week.

        This is the reality of social momentum these days. Resistance is no threat because it has extremely brief lifespan before moving onto the next thing to be a part of.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          I agree but not because it’s “trends” but because this system forces us to have short attention spans by presenting us with a massive deluge of information about horrible things happening everywhere (many of which are caused either directly or indirectly by that very system) so we have basically no choice but to keep shifting our focus and updating our threat assessments or risk becoming totally overwhelmed and falling behind or burning out.

      • Spitzspot@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It is something we can do right now though. Even the youth who can’t vote yet can participate.

      • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It also won’t work since the service has enough precision to know whether you go in, and for how long. The real issue is that mobile phones are continuously broadcasting their location to any device that wants to listen, even if you turn wifi and bluetooth off.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Or - OR, right, everyone can turn off location and WiFi on their phones.

      It’s true the cell ping is always going, but that’s a different thing and definitely not what this tool is using to track people. Odds are good it’s using facebook or some other cancer to perform this evil.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        That won’t work. But if you install the ROM without gapps or closed source software, you don’t have to worry about these issues.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Having just done that for the first time I feel confident in saying anyone who’s still using facebook or Xitter or tiktok or whatever - is not going to do that. I wish they would but that’s an order of magnitude more technical than where they are.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        Odds are good it’s using facebook or some other cancer to perform this evil.

        You really need to read the entire article. Turning off your WiFi and deleting Facebook isn’t going to fix this.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 minutes ago

          It’s a good start tho

          This sort of surveillance is only possible because of the mobile advertising ecosystem. Location data is sometimes used to build profiles on device users and better target advertisements to them. Much of that advertising relies on a MAID, the unique advertising ID, on a phone. The MAID acts as the digital glue between a device and its associated data.

          But that same underlying system, of Google and Apple linking a unique identifier on the phone to a user’s activity, allows Babel Street and others to build their mass monitoring products. In many cases, a device’s MAID is also displayed inside Babel Street.

          So periodically refresh / replace your ad id as well.

      • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        The problem is turning off wifi doesn’t actually turn off the wifi, it just stops a subset of packets being broadcast and won’t trasmit any data you want it to send. Among other things this is how ‘find my device’ works with the wifi and bluetooth “off”. They’re actually on.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Or - OR, right, everyone can turn off location and WiFi on their phones.

        Right now. But maybe not forever and so regulation to make sure that we canor even better, regs against this tracking. Because it shouldn’t be necessary.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think cellular location would be excluded from such tracking tbh. I would rather not take my phone with me at all when visiting such a potentially sensitive place, or at the very least use a Faraday cage.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Apple and Google can fix the problem. Apps are required to ask for permission to access location information. Most of the time, it’s for tracking and analytics, not anything related to the app’s functionality. That’s the data that is leaking to these data brokers.

    In those cases, if asked, user can say no, but apps keep haranguing you until you capitulate.

    Instead, the OS could add a button that says: “Yes, but randomize.” After that, location data is returned as normal, but from totally random locations nearby. They could even spoof the data clustering algorithms and just pick some rando location and keep showing returns to them, or just trade the data from one random phone for another every N days.

    You do this enough and the data will become polluted enough to become useless.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I don’t think this would be technically useful to prevent exploitation of location data. The handset always has to identify to a tower using the SIM card, which is going to identify the phone and its user. Your cellular service provider can still sell this information to data brokers.

      With that said, I would love the option to lie about my location to apps that have no business knowing it.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Or you just have some money to buy the data from a data broker that phone company sell your data to already.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            If they get a warrant, sure. Sell it I dunno. There’s more legal cases about cell tower data simply because it’s some form of technology courts have at least made an effort to understand at some point.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Well we know telco sells your traffic data as ISP as “anonymized” i dont see how they are not doing this with tower data but i am not familair with caseaw on the issue.

              So maybe there is aome legal bar to that…

              Amazing how warrant got turned into a joke in modern age tho all within last 30 years.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So why abortion clinics in the title if it can track people anywhere? Do they think abortion clinics are the most popular destination for the majority of people? Why not put pizza joint im the title? Or sex club? Bath house? Dairy farm?

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Because right now’s political climate is about how abortion is being billed en masse as murder, and people are having to go to other states to get abortions (even for miscarriages), so the states that bill abortion as murder want to be able to prosecute the women. So there are a lot of fears that states will be tracking women through tools like this, and it turns out the fearful were correct.

    • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s American focused and abortion is at the forefront of their christofascist-liberal culturwar.