• sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah I agree, but don’t you think its limiting someone’s rights to imprison them in the first place? That’s my entire point. Every method of reducing criminality other than simply ignoring it requires you to limit the rights of criminals.

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Imprisonments takes freedom away from you. That is the price you pay.

      Still, it doesn’t make you less human. It shouldn’t.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Humans are bipedal creatures that can walk places. Putting a human in a prison cell takes some of their humanity away.

    • Groovy Lizard@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Imprisonment is not a right, its a control system of the state. They should be the only party allowed to incarcerate, but when they sell it to private corps they can profit from it and it becomes a business, and this is the reason of all our discussion here.

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        No that has nothing to do with our discussion. Imprisoning someone inherently limits their rights. I didn’t say imprisonment was a right, I’m not sure where you got that from. The point is that imprisoning people is necessary, so limiting the rights of criminals is necessary.