• cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    To be fair, if you were to buy or build a house it won’t cost you any less.

    • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Right, but at least it will be your house. Instead of paying someone else’s mortgage and coming out of it with nothing for yourself.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not defending landlords here — just pointing out that housing is expensive right now regardless of who owns it. Construction costs are through the roof (no pun intended) even before factoring in a profit margin for the builder and/or the landlord. If I had to rebuild my house today it would cost at least 3x what I paid for it 15 years ago, and my income hasn’t tripled since then.

        • Comrade Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          The things is, its expensive because of landlords and shit like airbnd. They have shrunk the market which increases the value of whats left in the market. Landlords are the reason why housing is unaffordable. Which puts you at their doorstep to rent from them.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Landlords are definitely not the reason that new construction is so much more expensive. They want the lowest possible construction cost, not the highest.

            • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              Have you considered that the reason labor prices have increased is because the cost of living has increased so much, primarily driven by housing prices?

              • Thrashy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                Eh… Contractors are charging what they are charging now because they can, not necessarily because materials and labor costs justify it. I’ve been slowly rehabbing my basement this year, and I’m doing most of the work myself because the quotes I’ve been getting to have somebody do it for me are so steep that about half the time they would cover me setting up a whole competing company from scratch in addition to material costs. That’s not an exaggeration. For what the plumber wanted for a repipe I could buy all the tools I need, attend training, get certification and a license, set up an LLC, and go into business for myself, and still have enough money left over to cover my costs on the project.

                Not that I think all that profit is going into the pockets of the tradespeople doing the work, well compensated as they are, but at the end of the day it’s down to high demand and a shortage of skilled labor due to decades of us devaluing the trades as a career. If I’m in the top third of the income distribution and the only reason I can afford to maintain my very modest house is because I have the skillset to do it by myself, something’s gone haywire.

            • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              Corporate landlords are absolutely driving the prices up, combined with 3 decades of low interest and investors treating real estate like a speculative market. The material cost of housing is miniscule. North American homes are made out of paper and plywood.

              • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                If that’s the case, can you explain to the rest of us why landlords want high construction prices?

                • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  They’re not construction prices lol. Construction costs are like 5% of the total value of a home. The other 95% of the value of a home is due to houses being treated as assets in a speculative market.

                  Landlords want the prices to increase because it increases the value of their asset, which allows them to leverage it for greater loans to buy more assets, etc etc to eventually sell at hilariously inflated prices for massive ROIs. Or alternatively to charge massively inflated rental costs pegged to the value of the home. Higher value, higher rent, more $$$ in the landlord’s pocket.

                  So far costs of homes have only gone up since the 70’s. A house worth 200k 20 years ago is now worth 1.2 Mil. It is an excellent rate of return. The market shows no signs of slowing down, forget about getting cheaper. If you have the capital to invest, it’s basically free money. Or at least, it has been for the past 5 decades. I don’t see why it would stop now. Maybe climate disasters or war, we’ll see.

                  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Construction costs are like 5% of the total value of a home.

                    Maybe in Manhattan, but otherwise this is an absolutely pants-on-head ridiculous claim.

            • Comrade Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Heres the thing. Landlords buy up housing, this shrinks the market, this increases housing prices, this creates a demand for new homes, this increases demand for supplies and the price of labor for construction.

              Landlords obviously don’t want higher construction costs, but they do want more properties. Higher construction cost is a consequence of that, not the goal.

    • fishpen0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      As a former homeowner who is now renting again after moving across the country, you lose a lot renting.

      So many small and large details of my home I built for me that if I add to my apartment will only serve to let the landlord raise the rent later and/or evict me to find someone willing to pay more for my own additions.

      It’s less about what you spend and more about freedom, control, and who benefits from caring for the property.

      Also modern apartments are turning every aspect of living into add-on subscriptions. Pet rent, parking fee, ev charging fee, even gym fees are popping up now

      Thank god some federal laws changed that blocked landlords from bundling specific cable and internet providers. That was horrible the first time we moved west and found that your building controlled what services you could even buy.