lemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 months agoPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comlemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square91fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoYou don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like. That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 months agoI am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoAll you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 months agoIn software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoProve it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoTheir opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.
You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like.
That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.
I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.
All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.
That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.
At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.
Get real.
In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
Prove it.
https://security.apple.com/bounty/
Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.