lemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 4 days agoPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comlemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square93fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoYou don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like. That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-24 days agoI am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoAll you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoTheir opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-24 days agoIn software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoProve it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/
You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like.
That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.
I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.
All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.
That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.
At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.
Get real.
Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.
In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
Prove it.
https://security.apple.com/bounty/