soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 month ago10x cheaper than in 2010, and 40x-100x cheaper than in the 90s. It'll probably continue to decrease.i.postimg.ccexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-link10x cheaper than in 2010, and 40x-100x cheaper than in the 90s. It'll probably continue to decrease.i.postimg.ccsoumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareminzastro@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI love such curve-fitting techniques. By 2025 we can launch 1t into space for a few cents, if we follow the purple line.
minus-squaresoumerd_retardataire@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThe curve would be even worse if the y-axis was linear b.t.w. 🤷
minus-squareFermion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI think this actually is a linear regression plotted on a log y graph. Which a linear regression is a bad choice for something that must be asymptotic at best.
minus-squareFermion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoIt’s also absurd that the fit line dives down to be cheaper and earlier than an optimistic projection that will likely move further to the top right as time progresses. That’s a chart with an agenda, not an analytical regression.
I love such curve-fitting techniques. By 2025 we can launch 1t into space for a few cents, if we follow the purple line.
The curve would be even worse if the y-axis was linear b.t.w. 🤷
I think this actually is a linear regression plotted on a log y graph.
Which a linear regression is a bad choice for something that must be asymptotic at best.
It’s also absurd that the fit line dives down to be cheaper and earlier than an optimistic projection that will likely move further to the top right as time progresses. That’s a chart with an agenda, not an analytical regression.