Summary

UnitedHealth Group’s Optum subsidiary uses algorithms to identify patients and providers deemed to be receiving excessive mental health care, leading to reduced coverage and potential harm to patients.

Despite regulatory actions in some states, the company’s practices continue due to the lack of a unified regulatory oversight.

Mental health advocates argue that this fragmentation benefits insurance companies by allowing them to shift scrutinized practices to other jurisdictions.

  • Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Imagine what a tragedy that would be if the UHC CEO’s house was firebombed while they were away, or if his car exploded right before he got in it. I wonder what it would take to get the message across…

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Also executive dysfunction (fancy word for the motivation and planning it takes to do complex tasks like navigating bureaucracy) is a symptom of pretty much every mental illness ever making them the easiest population to collect a premium from then bury in paperwork and by doing so never actually have to pay out for services. When you add in having the government cut a check perr poor person to insurance companies to provide state benefits it basically becomes an infinite money glitch that churns faster the more people you force into poverty.

    • NycterVyvver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wow. I never considered executive functioning and neurodivergent related behaviors as predictable patterns for insurance companies to exploit, but you’re absolutely right.

  • Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    UnitedHealth is pure evil.

    If anyone ever burns down UnitedHealth facilities or murders anyone in their executive leadership, just know that if I am on your jury you are going to be acquitted.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Well this aged like a fine wine 🐸

      It won’t be a crime if the jury decides it ain’t a crime, jury nullification is the term. But if you don’t see a crime, there is no crime.

      Sadly only one so far.