this post has been making the rounds on Mastodon, for good reason. it’s nominally a post about the governance and community around C++, but (without spoiling too much) it’s written as a journey packed with cathartic sneers at a number of topics and people we’ve covered here before. as a quick preview, tell me this isn’t relatable:

This is not a feel good post, and to even call it a rant would be dismissive of the absolute unending fury I am currently living through as 8+ years of absolute fucking horseshit in the C++ space comes to fruition, and if I don’t write this all as one entire post, I’m going to physically fucking explode.

fucking masterful

an important moderator note for anyone who comes here looking to tone police in the spirit of the Tech Industry Blog Social Compact: lol

  • khalid_salad@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dan asked me “what’s the fastest Big O notation?” and hey, to my credit despite not having a college degree, I knew the answer from self studying! “Oh, I know this. O(1) Constant time”, I said over the phone. “No, see it’s O(0). The fastest program is the one that never runs. It’s clear you don’t have enough experience for this role. So let’s test you on your sysadmin capabilities. Maybe you can redeem yourself there”.

    There is something about the simultaneous pedantry and total ignorance in this that is enraging. Everything is O(1) space because there are 1081 atoms in the universe, and everything is O(1) time because of the heat death of the universe, don’tcha know. Also did I just solve the halting problem?

    • self@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      another absolutely fucked thing about the gotcha interview is, they never stop at just one. if you somehow read the interviewer’s mind and asspull the expected (not “correct”, mind you) answer, they’ll just go “huh” and instantly pivot to a different instant-fail gotcha. the point of the gotcha interview isn’t candidate selection; the point is that the asshole interviewer has power over the candidate, and can easily use gotchas to fabricate technical-sounding reasons for rejecting suitable candidates they personally just don’t like.

      shit like this is one reason our industry is full of fucking assholes; they select for their own by any practical means. it’s reminiscent of those rigged, impossible “literacy tests” they used to give voters in the south (that is, the southern US), where almost every question was a gotcha designed so that a poll worker could exclude Black voters at effectively their own discretion, complete with a bullshit paper trail in case anyone questioned the process.

      (also, how many of these assholes send candidates down a rabbit hole wasting time answering questions unrelated to the position when they don’t get the gotcha right? I swear that’s happened to me more than once, and I can only imagine it’s so nobody asks why most of the interviews are so short)

  • swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Eepy Status*: about 20% of the way through. This is all I have to share so far:

    Bjarne Stroustrup? More like, Blarney Should-Shut-Up.

    *yes, short for epistemic status. Don’t like it? Good, mission accomplished.

    Edit: Eepyness: 60% of the way through.

    This is a masterclass in tea spilling. So many shots fired at fucking everything. I am in awe.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eeps: 90%. I have found something to disagree with:

      Everybody loves Puerto Rican music (please get on this, you’re missing out)

      I cannot stand reggaeton, so this is a no from me.

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s a long read, but a good one (though not a nice one).

    • learn about how all the people who actually make decisions in c++ world are complete assholes!
    • liking go (the programming language) correlated with brain damage!
    • in c++ world, it is ok to throw an arbitrary number of highly competent non-bros out of the window in order to keep a bro on board, even if said bro drugged and raped a minor!
    • the c++ module system is like a gunshot wound to the ass!
    • c++ leadership is delusional about memory safety!
    • even more assholes!

    Someone on mastodon (can’t remember who right now) joked that they were expecting the c++ committee to publicly support trump, in the hopes he would retract the usg memory safety requirements. I can now believe that they might have considered that, and are probably hoping he’ll come down in their favour now that he’s coming in.

    • self@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can now believe that they might have considered that, and are probably hoping he’ll come down in their favour now that he’s coming in.

      I’m betting there are some juicy logs of something like this happening in the C++ Alliance Slack’s secret #unfiltered channel, given that its typical content allegedly consists of abuse directed towards marginalized people, coordination of harassment and misinformation on community platforms, and various other fash shit. it’s weird that a Slack so closely associated with the “professional and respectful” ISO C++ committee would host two (including the diet version, #on-topic) of what are essentially chan-style trolling channels for people who think they’re adults on an official Slack. maybe it shouldn’t be too surprising, since one committee member felt comfortable posting an extensive, unhinged COVID conspiracy rant on the WG21 mailing list — with a community like that, it’s just a matter of time before the assholes in charge go mask-off.

      and for anyone who hasn’t read the article yet, the above isn’t even the worst shit you’ll learn about, it’s a fucking rollercoaster (and there are some details alluded to that you’ll only pick up on a second reading too)